Answer: Inducements constitute an "undue influence" if they alter a potential subject’s decision-making processes, such that they do not appropriately weigh the risk-benefit relationship of the research.
Explanation:
Undue inducements are propositions that are so extremely attractive that they drive people to act in a way they ordinarily wouldn´t, or in a way that they would normally question on account of possible risks or underlying values.
Inducements are usually admissible, but sometimes they are undue, and the limit is difficult to be established. They become undue influence if they change potential subjects´ decision-making, undermining their capacity to properly weigh the risks and benefits of their participation in research.
The constitution has been mentioned by many people so far. Sure. That does answer your question in a literal sense. However, which dictators throughout history have ever cared about the laws in their country?
Besides laws and the constitution, what many Canadians would be reluctant to mention is the fact that there are 38+ million people in Canada, many of whom are armed. The prime minister is just one person. Sure, they control the military, but Canada is huge! Armed civilians using guerilla tactics would be a serious challenge for Canada's military, even if they backed the would be dictator, which I think would be unlikely, especially by a majority.
Just to be clear to our southern neighbours, we don't need “the 2nd” to defend ourselves from a would be dictator. We are just fine. And we have lots of guns.
Answer:
Path dependency.
Explanation:
Path dependency gives us an idea about why a product is still used, taking into account the user's preferences through the passing of time. It is possible for a company to keep choosing a product for its effectiveness no matter if innovative options appear. This is commonly related to how expensive it would be to create a new option instead of still using the current one.
Answer:
Anomie
Explanation:
Merton developed the concept of ‘anomie’ to describe this imbalance between cultural goals and institutionalised means. He argued that such an imbalanced society produces anomie – there is a strain or tension between the goals and means which produce unsatisfied aspirations.
Merton argued that when individuals are faced with a gap between their goals (usually finances/money related) and their current status, strain occurs. When faced with strain, people have five ways to adapt:
1. Conformity: pursing cultural goals through socially approved means.
2. Innovation: using socially unapproved or unconventional means to obtain culturally approved goals. Example: dealing drugs or stealing to achieve financial security.
3. Ritualism: using the same socially approved means to achieve less elusive goals (more modest and humble).
4. Retreatism: to reject both the cultural goals and the means to obtain it, then find a way to escape it.
5. Rebellion: to reject the cultural goals and means, then work to replace them.
Answer:
Transpiration, Evaporation, Atmosphere
Explanation:
Evaporation and Transpiration change liquid water into vapor, which goes into the atmosphere from rising air currents.
