Answer: I'm balanced I agree and disagree here is why,
Peter C. Perdue's China Marches West argues that the Qing dynasty's ability to break through historical territorial barriers on China's northwestern frontier reflected greater Manchu familiarity with steppe culture than their Chinese predecessors had exhibited, reinforced by superior commercial, technical, and symbolic resources and the benefits of a Russian alliance. Qing imperial expansion illustrated patterns of territorial consolidation apparent as well in Russia's forward movement in Inner Asia and, ironically, in the heroic, if ultimately futile, projects of the western Mongols who fell victim to the Qing. After summarizing Perdue's thesis, this essay extends his comparisons geographically and chronologically to argue that between 1600 and 1800 states ranging from western Europe through Japan to Southeast Asia exhibited similar patterns of political and cultural integration and that synchronized integrative cycles across Eurasia extended from the ninth to the nineteenth centuries. Yet in its growing vulnerability to Inner Asian domination, China proper—along with other sectors of the "exposed zone" of Eurasia—exemplified a species of state formation that was reasonably distinct from trajectories in sectors of Eurasia that were protected against Inner Asian conquest.
<span>The American Colonies were an integral, yet increasingly autonomous part of the British Empire and economy. A vast empire, including the colonies plus Canada, parts of the Caribbean, southern Africa, the Middle East, India, and other territories ensured the British freedom of the seas. So a large and productive segment of the British holdings declaring independence would be a jolt on London/</span>
Answer:
B and C
Explanation:
A) wrong because valley has nothing to do with the envoiorment,
B) correct beacsue the guly coast has heavy pollution problems in their water which can affect the air and that air travels over mexico city
C) correct, a big population can equal alot of litter!
D) wrong theyre has been some left over from that but thats not really quite dealing with the question
The correct answer is “patricians and plebeians”.
The division of the social classes in Rome between Patricians and Plebeians was based on birth. Plebeians hold the political power in their hands, they were free citizens, they would be born on these influentional families and would always hold power and money.
The Plebeians were workers - farmers, builders, and others - they consisted of the majority of the population of Rome. It was possible to climb socially, but it was an almost impossible task since they had little money and almost no influence on politics.
