Answer:
- Sole Proprietorship
- Partnership
- Limited Partnership
- Limited Liability Company
Explanation:
Sole Proprietorship is the type of business in which the liability is not limited. Due to this issue, the owner is solely responsible to pay off the debts of company from his personal owned assets if the business goes bankrupt.
Partnership is just like sole proprietorship but here the partners are the only responsible persons to payoff the debt of the company because the liability is limitless. The burden of the company debts is equally shared among the partners.
Limited Partnership is less risky because the liability is limited and only the amount invested in the business is subjected to the payment of borrowings from the lenders. The limited partner is responsible for his actions which means if his misdeed resulted in fine then it would be paid from his share first and then the other partners are equally liable to for compensation if their is still any amount left.
In the case of Limited liability company, the liability is limited and the burden of the payment of the liability falls on the company. So the investor is not subjected to pay the debts of the company because the limited liability company is a separate entity and is solely liable to pay for its debts.
Available Options Are:
A. A climate of caring will pervade.
B. Lawlessness all but ceases to exist.
C. People look after their own interests.
D. Small business starts increase.
E. Inflation decreases.
Answer:
Option A. A climate of caring will pervade.
Explanation:
When the people in a society start acting socially responsible which means that they value every single life on earth because acting socially means sustainability which says that the future generation needs must not be compromised in meeting current generation needs. Hence when everyone will be thinking as a socially responsible person then their will be a climate of care and every life matter would be understood by every single person on earth.
Answer
Financial advantage from further processing $31
Explanation:
<em>A company should process further a product if the additional revenue from the split-off point is greater than than the further processing cost. </em>
<em>Also note that all cost incurred up to the split-off point (the cost of crushing) are irrelevant to the decision to process further . </em>
<em> $</em>
Sales revenue after the split off point( 64+64) 128
Sales revenue at the split-off point (16+47) <u> 63</u>
Additional sales revenue 65
Further processing cost ( 15+19) <u>(34
)</u>
<em>Net income after further processing 31</em>
Financial advantage from further processing $31
<span>When a U.S. airplane manufacturer sells its airplanes to business executives in Germany without using intermediaries, it is referred to as? Direct exporting. Even though the airplanes were sold without using intermediaries making them a direct export there are still processes that have to be followed within the exchange. A benefit to direct exporting allows the the costs and confusions using a middle man to create, to be irrelevant as there is no middle man just the two companies/countries doing an exchange. </span>
Giving positive reinforcement when a student comes close to what you wanted
