Answer:
A, B and D
Explanation:
Expanding the money supply is an exercise of expansionary monetary policy.
This decision will first allow our tech startup to acquire cheaper loans and expand our operations, this expansion in operations will result in new employment opportunities and hence as a result, unemployment will be reduced assuming this is a general trend in the economy.
This decision also directly reflects an increased investment and hence the GDP on the whole and the investment part of GDP would both increase,
GDP = C + I + G + (X - M), where I = investment.
This change in macro economy will increase aggregate demand due to expansionary effects. Increase in imports is not conclusive as it may or may not happen depending upon the demand state.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
The correct answer that fills the gaps are: constant
; increasing.
Explanation:
GDP per capita, income per capita or income per capita is an economic indicator that measures the relationship between the level of income of a country and its population. For this, the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of said territory is divided by the number of inhabitants.
The use of per capita income as an indicator of wealth or economic stability of a territory makes sense because through its calculation national income is interrelated (through GDP in a specific period) and the inhabitants of this place.
The objective of GDP per capita is to obtain data that somehow shows the level of wealth or well-being of that territory at a given time. It is often used as a measure of comparison between different countries, to show differences in economic conditions.
Answer:
C. A country can specialize in producing that for which it has a comparative advantage and then trade for other needed goods and services.
Explanation:
<em>Comparative advantage</em> is simply evaluating the opportunity cost of other benefits or costs, if the country is opting to choose for a specific category of goods for production purposes.
For example, let's say US can produce 20 Television (TV) sets and 50 Air Conditioners in a month. Here, the opportunity cost of producing 1 TV set is 50/20 i.e. 2.5 Air Conditioners. Similarly, the opportunity cost of producing 1 Air Conditioner (AC) is 20/50 i.e. 0.4 TV set. Hence, US should produce Air Conditioners over TV sets as per <em>Comparative Advantage</em> concept.
Take another example, let's say UK can produce 50 Television (TV) sets and 20 Air Conditioners in a month. Hence, the opportunity cost of producing 1 TV set is 20/50 i.e. 0.4 Air Conditioner. On the other hand, the opportunity cost of producing 1 AC is 50/20 i.e. 2.5 TV sets. Thus, UK should produce TV sets over AC's as per <em>Comparative Advantage </em>model.
Hence, US should export AC's to UK and import TV sets from UK to gain from specialization and trade.
<em> In this way nations can gain from specialization and trade by making use of Comparative Advantage theory</em>.
It is to be noted that <em>Absolute Advantage model </em>of Adam Smith is also good as it highlights production of that good by a country, which it can produce in large quantities with fewer resources and minimal time than any other nation in the world. But the <em>Comparative Advantage Model </em>developed by David Ricardo considers opportunity cost and is much more refined than Absolute Advantage Model.
<em></em>
An example of Private land use control is illustrated in a Subdivision regulations that is imposed by developers in an effort to maintain control of the development of the subdivision.
<h3>What is a
Private land use control?</h3>
This refers to a land control with a deed restrictions that limits what can be done on the property by the owner.
Hence, Private land use control is illustrated in a Subdivision regulations that is imposed by developers in an effort to maintain control of the development of the subdivision.
Read more about Private land
brainly.com/question/626688
#SPJ1
