The correct answer is C) the federal government could not force a state governor to return a fugitive.
Until 1987, in cases of extradition, the federal government could not force a state governor to return a fugitive.
For extradition, we understand the faculty that the government of the United States has to surrender a fugitive to other country or state because it has to face criminal charges.
With the Supreme Case of "Kentucky vs. Dennison" in 1860, the federal court did not have the authority to demand the return of a fugitive to another state. This changed in 1987 with the resolution of the case "Puerto Rico v. Brandstand," that overruled the "Kentucky vs. Dennison" case.
I’m almost positive this is right. I match the colors to the box. I’d check to make sure though.
<span>Italy invaded Ethiopia because they wanted land, were angry for loses in WWI--they can now get the land because their military is stronger--, also they wanted a chunk of Africa like everyone else</span>
Hitler is appealing to nationalism because he is only about his country, Germany and about wanting Germany to be the supreme leader over other countries by getting rid of the “bad” and “not pure” people/groups.
The Declaration of Sentiments, also known as the Declaration of Rights and Sentiments,[1] is a document signed in 1848 by 68 women and 32 men—100 out of some 300 attendees at the first women's rights convention to be organized by women. The convention was held in Seneca Falls, New York, now known as the Seneca Falls Convention. The principal author of the Declaration was Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who based it on the form of the United States Declaration of Independence. She was a key organizer of the convention along with Lucretia Coffin Mott, and Martha Coffin Wright.
According to the North Star, published by Frederick Douglass, whose attendance at the convention and support of the Declaration helped pass the resolutions put forward, the document was the "grand movement for attaining the civil, social, political, and religious rights of women."[2][3]
At a time when traditional roles were still very much in place, the Declaration caused much controversy. Many people respected the courage and abilities behind the drafting of the document, but were unwilling to abandon conventional mindsets. An article in the Oneida Whig published soon after the convention described the document as "the most shocking and unnatural event ever recorded in the history of womanity." Many newspapers insisted that the Declaration was drafted at the expense of women's more appropriate duties. At a time when temperance and female property rights were major issues, even many supporters of women's rights believed the Declaration's endorsement of women's suffrage would hinder the nascent women's rights movement, causing it to lose much needed public support.
