I would say that a poem by a Romanticist will celebrate the individual and emotions, whereas a poem by a naturalist (or even maybe a realist) will be objective and nonjudgmental in its detailed and realistic portrayal of war.
The point of view presented in the text is the first-person point of view.
<h3>Why is this the first-person point of view?</h3>
- The first-person point of view is one where a character in the story becomes the narrator.
- This character begins to tell his own story, showing what he has seen, what he knows, and his own thoughts and emotions.
A very simple way to understand this kind of point of view is to identify pronouns. This is because the first-person point of view uses personal pronouns like "I," "my" and "mine."
More information on narrative points of view at the link:
brainly.com/question/13845140
It all depends on one's confidence and way of expressing themselves. Personally, I would say no. After everything that's been going on in this horrid year of 2020, the BLM movement has reasons. Since society today <em>still</em> has to fight for black lives (as well as others that aren't cis, straight, white men), the Pledge of Allegince speaks lies. Many people may pledge "justice for all," but our actions speak different from our words. If you are safe and have the confidence to rebel for what is just, <em>do not stand</em>, as one with heart shall not stand for injustice.
Hope this helps!
I absolutely love writing stuff like this, and it feels good.
Answer:
They show where quotations are from
