1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tamiku [17]
3 years ago
6

If a passenger under 18 is not restrained by a seat belt or child safety seat, who is legally at fault?

Law
1 answer:
WINSTONCH [101]3 years ago
8 0
The person who is driving is at fault
You might be interested in
Why should the state provide free legal assistance to those<br>charged with really serious crimes?​
viktelen [127]

Access to justice is now more critical than ever. within the u. s., Americans need a lawyer’s help for everything from avoiding an unjust eviction to preventing a wrongful conviction. Yet, effective legal assistance remains out of reach for the bulk of american citizens. The gap between legal needs and also the services available exacerbates systemic inequities and downsides that may only grow over the subsequent four years. This series examines the state of access to justice within the u. s. and the way public and personal actors can collaborate to create justice equal for all Americans.

For two years, Mary Hicks paid $975 per month for a run-down Washington, D.C., apartment. When she contacted the owner about mold and mildew within the bathroom and holes within the walls, he did nothing. After Mary began to withhold rent, her landlord sued her.

Mary sought help from a law clinic. Her student attorneys not only kept her from being evicted and ensured that her landlord made the repairs but also reduced her rent to $480 after discovering that her unit was rent-controlled.1

Mary was fortunate. While 90 to 95 percent of landlords are represented by lawyers before the owner and Tenant Branch of the D.C. judicature, only 5 to 10 percent of tenants have legal assistance.2 Unlike criminal defendants, parties in civil cases don't have a generalized right to counsel. While all states provide a right to counsel for a minimum of some styles of civil cases, most parties in civil cases that involve high stakes and basic human needs, like housing, don't have a right to representation.3

In more than three-fourths of all civil trial cases within the u. s., a minimum of one litigant doesn't have a lawyer.4 Figures are even starker when it involves family law, violence, housing, and small-claims matters—those involving disputes over amounts up to $25,000, betting on the state. a minimum of one party lacks representation in 70 to 98 percent of those cases.5

And these are just the Americans who make it to court. Without access to legal advice, many are unaware of their legal rights and potential claims. Past estimates and more moderen state-by-state studies suggest that about 80 percent of the civil legal needs of these living in poverty go unmet6 in addition as 40 to 60 percent of the requirements of middle-income Americans.7 But because these figures rely upon self-selection and self-reporting, however, and since many Americans don't identify their unmet legal needs in and of itself, it's impossible to estimate Americans’ total unmet legal needs.8

To deny Americans access to legal assistance is to deny them their rights and protections. this can be because, to a greater degree than other countries, the u. s. places the burden on a private to hunt justice by visiting court.9 Other developed democracies have enshrined the proper to counsel in civil cases and devote 3 to 10 times more funding to civil legal aid than the u. s..10 In areas from environmental regulation and workplace discrimination to civil rights and housing, Americans must hire or find their own attorneys to enforce the law. The result's a divide between those that can afford legal assistance and people who cannot.

This issue brief is that the first during a series that examines access to justice as a long-neglected policy concern integral to American democracy—one that's under threat from the approaching administration.11 It provides important information on the U.S. justice gap and makes the case for prioritizing improvements in civil aid and indigent defense through legislative and infrastructure initiatives. It also outlines steps that state legislators, courts, and out of doors actors, like advocacy organizations, can desire make justice equal.

6 0
3 years ago
Which is not a helpful hint for allowing a victim to regain control?
Mama L [17]

Answer:

Give permission to express any reactions

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. If rules are universal, or if rules are not universal - does that make you feel more secure in making a decision?
crimeas [40]

Answer:

According to me...I won't feel confident when making that decision because that decision will be based on the rules that I must follow and I also believe that when I'm taking a decision is going to be based on what situation you are in.

So decisions are not suppose to be based on rules because everyone have a right to take or make a decision that is suitable for themselves.

8 0
3 years ago
How long will your license be revoked for after your 4th DUI
xxMikexx [17]

Answer: Driver’s license revocation for 18 months

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Detective Stanton gets a tip from John Bratton’s neighbor that Bratton is dealing drugs out of his house. Detective Stanton and
netineya [11]

ANSWER: The exclusionary rule states that any evidence that is obtain illegally, (i.e without a warrant) and any statements obtained through an illegal interrogation, which violate the Fourth, Fifth, or Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, will not be an acceptable evidence at a criminal trial in the court.

This exclutionary rule applies only to criminal case and not to civil case. Because John Bratton has a murder case charge, which are the dead bodies found in his properties. John Bratton's case is a civil case, and all evidence filed with his case should be admissible in the court of law.

Sara Sutton will not be charged for illegally selling gun, but will be charged for being a sole sponsor of a civil crime case charged against Bratton. This will make Sara Sutton to be prosecuted along side with Bratton, in the case.

If Sara Sutton is charged for illegally selling of guns, it will be a criminal case which will not be admissible by the court, due to exclusionary rule, because the police got their evidence without a search warrant.

John Bratton will not be charged for drug abuse offense, which is a criminal case, because all evidence provided will not be accepted due to exclusionary rule. Stankowitcz has busted into Bratton's apartment without a search warrant.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did Supreme Court decisions incorporating the Bill of Rights mean?
    12·2 answers
  • The Bureau of Consumer Protection is one part of the Federal Trade Commission. How do regulatory agencies like these impact cons
    13·1 answer
  • What is the main difference between natural rights and classical republicanism
    15·1 answer
  • Is popular sovereignty important to a republic? Why or why not?
    6·1 answer
  • Discussed the connection and conflict between natural law (morals) and civil law (man-made). Which do you see as more important
    5·1 answer
  • vì sao quy chế pháp lý hành chính của người nước ngoài ở Việt Nam hạn chế hơn so với công dân Việt Nam
    5·1 answer
  • What was historically significant about Mosaic Law?
    10·2 answers
  • Cyber forensics phases
    13·1 answer
  • What will happen to the interest income of a 401k the longer you have the plan?
    5·1 answer
  • Although the judge in trial court may have rendered a decision, for what reason can a person convicted of a crime appeal to the
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!