1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Korvikt [17]
3 years ago
6

How has the supreme court ruled on executive

History
2 answers:
LiRa [457]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The Supreme Court has ruled that executive privilege is part of being president. However, executive privilege is limited.

The Supreme Court case that ruled on this was US vs. Nixon. During this time, Richard Nixon was being put on trial for his possible ties to the Watergate scandal. When this issue was brought to court, the courts demanded phone conversations that were taped from the president. However, Nixon said that he did not have to give up these tapes because they were part of his "executive privilege." The Supreme Court did not agree with Nixon.

The Supreme Court ruled that nobody is above the law and that presidents cannot use this idea to simply escape punishment.

3

Explanation:

google

Nana76 [90]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: the supreme court has ruled that the executive privilege is part of being president. However, executive privilege is limited.

You might be interested in
1. All describe conditions in Texas by 1850 EXCEPT. a: Nearly all Native Americans had been removed from East Texas. b: All Nati
Alika [10]
B: All Native Americans had been removed from the western frontier :) Hope that helped
7 0
3 years ago
Which process is a way that plants maintain homeostasis?
Allisa [31]

Answer:

C. growing leaves to warm up

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Stalin signed a nonaggression pact with Germany because
ozzi
Stalin signed a nonaggression pact with Germany because he knew that Europe was on the brink of another major war, and he wanted time to be able to build up the Soviet military. 
3 0
3 years ago
Why might the olmec have carved their leaders' heads in colossal size?
lesya [120]
They wanted to present them as if they were gods. This was quite common in history and is a reason for example why pharaohs got pyramids built in their honor. The giant heads depicted their leaders as gods or someone who is in general larger than life itself. It was a sign of respect and others who would visit would also see this and know who they are dealing with. Such heads can still be found and examined which is important when trying to understand their ancient culture.
6 0
3 years ago
Read the sentence. “Additionally, Johnson contributed to Apollo 11’s milestone 1969 moon landing.” How does the use of the word
Veronika [31]

Answer: significnce

Explanation: the word milestone shows that contribution was to an important or significant event.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the creation of a reliable food supply lead to political changes during the Neolithic Revolution?
    6·2 answers
  • HELP ASAP
    8·2 answers
  • Annual food production in Acient Egypt was completely dependent on______.
    9·2 answers
  • Which statement about Shi'ite Muslims is true?
    13·2 answers
  • This lake, in Africa, is named after a queen.
    6·1 answer
  • *PLEASE ANSWER* What big problem did India face as soon as it received its independence in 1947? a.) the public's fear of a comm
    15·2 answers
  • Please match the correct person to the correct definition. PLZ HELP ME :(
    8·1 answer
  • Spain entered the Revolutionary War in 1779 to help.
    12·1 answer
  • Which is true of Pan-Africanism?
    11·1 answer
  • Mohammad Gandhi nonviolent protest persuaded India to-
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!