Answer:
Confidence and Intelligence
Explanation:
I believe that confidence is an important trait for the president as without it the ideas and opinions of the President won't be heard. as well as this, the president often talks in public, therefore, they have to be able to be calm and a figure which inspires people. Essentially a figure which is a role model because the President is in a role in which millions of people look up to them for answers. This leads to my next point.
Intelligence is also a key aspect as they need to be able to think on their feet and be able to have the right words to describe what they are trying to inform people about. They need to be able to portray this attribute so they can be admired and therefore trusted. As you wouldn't want someone who doesn't have a clue what's going on to run a nation which can start the next world war in a matter of seconds.
The law of nature helps building a society with perfect freedom like equality before law
Opium--China had many products wanted by Britain but wanted nothing in return. Great Britain introduced opium to even the trade.
When Great Britain began trading directly with China they purchased tea, silk, porcelain, and other Chinese goods. However, China wanted nothing in return so Great Britain had to pay cash and never saw the cash return. Great Britain had access to opium in their Indian colony and introduced it to the Chinese people creating a demand for a British good in addition to an addiction crisis in China. This would result in the Opium War between China and Great Britain.
Answer:
The caught diseases brought by Europeans. Thousands of Native Americans died from the diseases and from the brutality of the Europeans who tried to use force on Native Americans to work on plantations.
<u>Answer:</u>
- Descartes' method was <u>rationalism</u>, working deductively from principles inside the mind.
- Bacon's method was <u>empiricism</u>, working inductively from the evidence of experience.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Francis Bacon (1561 – 1626) recommended the sort of thing we now call the scientific method. His approach is known as empiricism, meaning that truth is arrived at by experimentation and the observations of experience. He even went so far as to say that the best form of science does not start with a hypothesis, because then the researcher would be biased toward wanting to prove his hypothesis correct. Bacon's recommendation was to start purely by observing all available data and sifting through it, letting a hypothesis present itself from the observed facts. An example of this would be the way a crime scene investigator processes a crime scene -- simply documenting everything about the scene and working through the evidence before arriving at a theory of what happened.
René Descartes (1596 – 1650) took a different approach, which is called rationalism. Descartes proposed that we can't be sure of truth by relying on our senses and observed experiences, because our senses can be deceived. We also could be dreaming or hallucinating. So he wanted a path to truth that started only with what we had before observing anything else -- which meant starting inside his own mind. "I think, therefore I am," was Descartes' famous statement that asserted that, at the very least, he knew he existed because he was thinking. Even if he was dreaming or hallucinating, he (as a thinking thing of some sort) had to exist in order to be doing that. From there he extrapolated to show that our experience of our own bodies and the physical world could be trusted, at least generally so, as we pursue knowledge. It would take a lot to explain his path of thought in his book, <em>Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting One's Reason and of Seeking Truth in the Sciences </em>(1637). This has already been a long enough explanation, though, so I'll stop here!
