Answer: continuous schedule and switch later to partial schedule (variable ratio)
Explanation: reinforcement schedule can be said to be guidlines or rules that govern how, when a behavior should be expressed. It determines the rate of occurence of a target behavior, how it will happen, strengthens it and even when it will continue or stop.
There are 2 types of reinforcement schedule. Which is continuous and partial schedule. The continuous reinforcement schedule tend to use the positive reinforcement strategy. It rewards for a particular behavior is on a continuous basis. Everytime a target behavior is expressed, the person or animal is rewards. The partial reinforcement schedule is of four type and the best for this kind of behavior after switching from continuous reinforcement schedule is the variable ratio schedule. Here a behavior is rewarded variably. The person does not know when the reward will come and so he continues to portray that behavior expected of him or her. It's the best type of schedule when switching from continuous reinforcement schedule.
Answer:
Projective personality, objective personality
Explanation:
Projective personality refers to a type of personality test whereby responses are required from ambiguous words. The main purpose of this test is to expose the hidden emotions onto the test with the hope that these issues can then be resolved through psychotherapy.
Objective personality refers to test which comprises of several validity scales which helps to determine if a client is responding to questions truthfully. This type of test is used to measure psychopathology.
Answer: Cuzco is in Peru
Explanation: hope it helps :)
Answer:Direct rule
Explanation:
The scramble coincided with a new era in global colonial expansion known as "the New Imperialism", which saw a shift in focus from trade and indirect rule to formal colonial control of vast overseas territories ruled as political extensions of their mother countries
Two principal tactics are used in gerrymandering: "cracking" (i.e. diluting the voting power of the opposing party's supporters across many districts) and "packing" (concentrating the opposing party's voting power in one district to reduce their voting power in other districts).[3] The third tactic, shown in the top-left diagram in the diagrams to the right, is that of homogenization of all districts.
The purpose is to help or hinder a particular demographic, such as a political, ethnic, racial, linguistic, religious, or class group, such as in U.S. federal voting district boundaries that produce a majority of constituents representative of African-American or other racial minorities, known as "majority-minority districts"
The problem is that it causes increased incumbent advantage and campaign costs
, less descriptive representation
, or using prisoners as voter count.
