Answer:
Children's advertisement is so easy because they can influence other children. Yet that is where the ethical problems start. Kids aren't smart enough to know what they're selling to marketers. Advertisers already know that kids are going to exercise large numbers of Influence on their parents and in doing so can be relentless. When both children and parents are most insecure. They are insecure because when they are exhausted and hungry in the grocery store, the child's fervent pleas often result in the parent purchasing those products. Children seem to want almost any marketed product because the distinction between what is true and what is pretended is often not understood by them. If an ad shows a toy doing an impressive feat, they assume that if they buy it, it will do that. Ads frequently contain false statements or exaggerated content. While these are preceded by a legislative note, they are usually overshadowed by the pomp and display of the commercials. Children advertising gets even worse it can cause all types of things for example obesity. Food firms spend almost $11 billion on TV ads annually, according to the Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity. In addition, a study conducted in Brazil found that 50 percent of children's advertisement is food related, and 80 percent of those are unhealthy foods high in sugar, fat, and salt. Advertisements present the wrong notion that it makes kids good or content to eat a particular drink or fast food. Under the influence of such ads, children tend to demand to buy more unhealthy foods, leading to obesity. Another reason I think that children's advertising is bad because it can give them negative feelings. I say negative feelings because children can be affected by these ads and tend to equate themselves with their peers or believe that they are either superior or inferior to the rest. Such actions may either decrease their trust in themselves or make them feel superior to others.
Explanation:
In the media they portray sport personalities such as footballers as a negative way and only showing this way, this can influence people who are fans of the players or the team and follow them in their foot steps which can lead to others acting to other people in this, negative way.
Answer:
A is the correct ans in my view
A. Plagiarism
It can lead to accusations of plagiarism.
Explanation:
In the 1990 film adaptation, Jack is portrayed by Chris Furrh. He is sixteen, two years older than Ralph, and has blond hair. Like all the other boys in this version of the story, Jack is American and attends an unnamed American military boarding school. He wears the rank insignia for cadet first lieutenant, making him the third-ranked cadet on the island, after Cadet Lieutenant Colonel Ralph and Cadet Captain Roger.
Jack in this version speaks faster than his British counterpart in the 1963 film does, and more often. He swears violently, more than anyone else in the film. He is vain, arrogant, and immature, but as he becomes leader of the Hunters and then ousts Ralph as the Chief, he quickly adopts a brutal and authoritarian style of leadership. In this version of the story, several boys leave with Jack immediately when he declares he will form his own camp. Jack relies on Roger throughout the film as a right-hand-man and enforcer.
Jack is visibly shocked when Roger kills Piggy, but does nothing about it. Instead, he drives Ralph away and soon sets most of the island on fire in an effort to force Ralph out of hiding. When U.S. Marines land just as the boys are about to kill Ralph, Jack, like the others, is completely surprised and unsure of what to do.
Jack's last name is never said in the 1990 film, or is his cadet rank actually referred to. He quickly dispenses with his uniform and any formalities of military rank, in any case, and all the boys simply refer to and address him as "Jack", or as "Chief" once he has overthrown Ralph and taken charge as the new leader.
