Looking at this in terms of sets, let's call O the set of all owls, and F the set of all things that can fly. What this original statement is saying every animal that's a member of the set of all owls is also a member of the set of all things that can fly, or in other words, O⊂F (O is a subset of F). Negating this tells us that, while there's <em>at least one</em> element of O that also belongs to F, O is not contained entirely in F (O⊆F, in notation), so a good negation or our original statement might be:
<em>Not all owls can fly.</em>
Answer:
90% of people marry there 7th grade love. since u have read this, u will be told good news tonight. if u don't pass this on nine comments your worst week starts now this isn't fake. apparently if u copy and paste this on ten comments in the next ten minutes you will have the best day of your life tomorrow. you will either get kissed or asked out in the next 53 minutes someone will say i love you
If you want help, could you take a pic of the prisms. I'd be happy to help then!
Step-by-step explanation:
I think it’s B I’m not sure
Answer:
Y=21
Step-by-step explanation:
add 13 on both sides you get Y=21
Answer:
15:21:35
Step-by-step explanation:
to find this answer you must find a ratio in which both bs are the same
so
multiple a:b by 3 and b:c by 7
15:21 21:35
then you can put the bs together
15:21:35
that is your answer
