Step-by-step explanation:
7 - 3b-2(0 + 3 - 2b)
To simplify the expression in the box, Fatua used
these steps:
Step 1:7 - 3b-2(3 - 3b)
Step 2:7 - 3-6-36-
Step 3: -13 - 66
Did Fatua calculate correctly? if nnot, in what step
did she make her FIRST mistake?
The answer is ASA.
Given that ∠A = ∠O, ∠W = ∠N, SW = TN, this shows that the two angles (∠A and ∠W) and the included side SW of the first triangle are equal to the two angles (∠O and ∠N) and the included side TN of the second triangle. This means that third angles ∠S and ∠T are also equal. Therefore, the two triangles ΔWAS and ΔNOT are congruent based from the ASA Postulate.
Answer:
-784
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
answer d and e
Step-by-step explanation:
First, you need to figure out the radius of B.
As radius of A is 6 in, 20% of 6in would be 1.2in. So total radius of B = 6+1.2 = 7.2
Now you get the radius of B, calculate th area of B using the formula πr^2.
= π(7.2)^2 = 162.86 = area of B
Now, all answers except D and E is smaller than B. So, the answer would be D and E.
