1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Maurinko [17]
3 years ago
12

Joe has anti-social personality disorder. Initially he makes a good first impression on people, and he possesses good social ski

lls. However, he uses these skills in a very manipulative fashion and has gotten in trouble several times and cannot hold a job because of his "con artist" schemes. Though others around him are concerned about how he has manipulated them (especially those he has cheated out of money), Joe is totally unconcerned about his behavior and says his detractors are "sweating the small stuff." Of the criteria for determining whether Joe’s behavior is abnormal, what should be considered?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Scorpion4ik [409]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The answer is Subjective Distress

Explanation:

Antisocial personality disorder is a mental condition whereby a person has a long-term destructive pattern of exploiting, manipulating, or violating the rights of anyone without remorse. They cause discomfort or distress to others by being deceitful, impulsive, showing socially unacceptable behavior.

The general diagnostic criteria for a personality disorder according to the DSM-IV-TR (Diagnostic statistical manual of mental disorders), the pattern leads to clinically significant distress or impairment in social occupational, or other important areas of functioning. The personality traits must be inflexible, maladaptive and cause functional impairment or subjective distress.

You might be interested in
Plez help 20 points plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Mars2501 [29]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

because its asking which one is not true and a,b,c are ways to cool off which is not asking for so yeah hope this helps :)

3 0
3 years ago
If you are writing a critique that claims an argument is based on sheltered or narrow logic that cannot hold up to real-world ex
tia_tia [17]

Answer:

that is calm and respectful while still criticizing the writer's inability to understand a wider perspective.                        

Explanation:

n simple words, one has to remain calm and civilized in writing some formal agreement or any other such document. The writer has to keep in mind that the motive of the reply or the message is not to insult the other party but to make sure the understanding of the messages between the two parties must be established.

Thus, even if one feel dissatisfied or angry from someone while writing some formal critique he or she should not use aggressive language.

4 0
3 years ago
What does this chat below seem to demonstrate?
galina1969 [7]

Answer:

it means streaks

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When contrasting life-course-persistent offenders with adolescence-limited offenders, researchers agree that:______.
FinnZ [79.3K]

When contrasting life-course persistent offenders with adolescent-limited offenders, researchers agree that: the causes and consequences of the two are very different.

One of the strongest correlates of crime is age, with a common empirical finding of an adolescent rise and peak of offending. One theory in particular, Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy, advances a specific hypothesis for the age–crime relationship, with a focus on a specific typology of offenders, adolescence-limited who offend for specific reasons during adolescence. This chapter reviews the adolescence-limited hypothesis  relevant empirical research, and concludes with summary statements, challenges to Moffitt’s adolescence-limited hypothesis, and directions for future research.

There are other theories that have been developed to explain the rise and peak of adolescent offending. Patterson   (1997) set out a learning model in which decreases in parents monitoring and supervision during adolescence lead adolescents to offend. Another explanation is Agnew’s (2003) integrated theory of the adolescent peak in offending. Recalling that adolescents are given only some adult privileges and responsibilities, Agnew believes that this has important effects on increasing delinquency among adolescents, including  a decline in supervision  increased social and academic demands  participation in a larger, more diverse peer-oriented social world  an increase in the desire for adult privileges, and  reduced ability to cope in a legitimate manner and an increase in the disposition to cope in an illegitimate (delinquency/crime) manner to attain the adult privileges and goods they want

Learn more about contrasting life-course persistent offenders

brainly.com/question/6258097

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
The original purpose of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 was to
nata0808 [166]
The answer should be letter choice B 

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which statement provides the best example of political leaders showing civic virtue? A. Lawmakers peacefully debate about the bu
    14·2 answers
  • In horticultural societies, what is the source of most of women’s subsistence work?
    10·1 answer
  • The Grand Canyon is an example of
    7·1 answer
  • A section of highway is posted with a 55 mph speed limit. In fact, speeds of cars traveling on this section are normally distrib
    12·1 answer
  • What do turbans indicate about the wearer?
    8·2 answers
  • When a child who uses autonomous morality asks, "why did you throw the ball that hit me in the head?" she is searching for infor
    11·1 answer
  • What is ment by prehistoric age ?​
    10·2 answers
  • Match each reformer with his or her cause
    9·2 answers
  • How did early civilizations influence the development of India?
    6·1 answer
  • Why did france invade mexico? where was the battle? how did the battle end?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!