Answer:
Ethical Issues
Explanation:
The argument you are using expresses Kant's Categorical Imperative, which talks about not stealing as an ethical and moral issue.
Ethical issues usually include:
- Do the right thing.
- Do it because it's the right thing to do.
- Don't do wrong things.
- Avoid them because they are wrong.
Which comparing to the other answers seems to fit your rational the best.
Thus you are trying to persuade your colleague with arguments about Ethical Issues.
I'm also sorry about the other users answer, I hate when people answer questions just to get points so I hope this helps you out. Have a great day!
All of the given practices can be effective in minimizing group harms.
Answer: Option E
Explanation:
As mentioned in the options, a collaborative review of the ongoing research by the Institutional Review Board can be taken from time to time during the course of the research to check whether the group of human samples is facing any adverse effects of the research or not.
A chalked plan promising the disclosure of the results of the research can also help in decreasing group harm. Moreover, consultation among the parties participated in research can also reduce the risk of group harm.
Answer:
the American perspective would be a good job ,a good home , a great family just a good life
Explanation:
because not all americans are true americans there are some americans who came from really messed up places so all that stuff is great
Answer:
Organic pathway.
Explanation:
The organic pathway of the carbon cycle moves carbon from the atmosphere, through producers such as plants and algae etc in the process of photosynthesis and back to the atmosphere in the process of respiration of living organisms. In the process of photosynthesis, carbondioxide is taken by the plant from the air to make glucose. When this glucose is eaten by the animals, it again converted into carbondioxide gas in the process of respiration and goes to the atmosphere again.
The answer is a desirable outcome. In an approach-approach, the individual is faced with the necessity of making a choice between two (or more) desirable goals. Since both goals are desirable, this is the least worrying situation. "Shall I fly or take a boat to Europe?" might be easily determined if both means of travel are seen as pleasurable. Such situations produce a state of unstable equilibrium. As soon as one goal is approached, its desirability increases and completely dominates, thereby making the choice easy. The choice becomes easier the closer one moves toward either goal. Another example is when a person pick between two attractive and practicable careers, may lead to some indecisiveness but rarely to great distress. A person chooses the most convenient goal that results to a desirable outcome.
