1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nina [5.8K]
3 years ago
10

Tammy has a positive view of challenges: She views them as tasks to be mastered. She develops a deep interest in and a strong co

mmitment to becoming a good teacher. When she doesn’t pass her first teaching praxis exam, she quickly recovers and works to overcome the setback. Albert Bandura would say Tammy has ________.
Social Studies
1 answer:
emmainna [20.7K]3 years ago
6 0
Tammy has confidence and determination to master her challenges.
You might be interested in
Four noble truths in a sentences.
svet-max [94.6K]

Answer:

huh i dont even understand what you are saying

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What did the farmers in Pennsylvania do that caused Congress to call them “rioters” and “offenders”? answer hurry
MrRa [10]
They stole food and goods from people in the army 
6 0
3 years ago
Explain 5 major effects of Colonization on Africa.
PtichkaEL [24]

Answer:

Colonization did a number on Africa, but it wasn’t all bad (look at me trying to justify the actions of our tormentors). But joking aside colonization was responsible for one of humanity’s worst atrocities slavery... you know what, let me use a pros and cons list coz I just might end up rambling

"Cons"

Plundering of Africa’s natural resources. When European colonialists came to Africa, they came looking for raw materials for their industries (African countries started to be colonized right around the time the industrial revolution had taken root and spread all over Europe). There were also other economic and political reasons for invading Africa.

Slavery. When the colonialists came and found our great grandparents (yes it wasn’t that long ago), they found that we hadn’t developed to anything close their level. Africans were living in simple communities, we had just gone beyond hunters and gatherers and had begun adopting farming, animal keeping and participating in barter trade. We had what you would consider a rudimentary government and hierarchical leadership structures. And in terms of weaponry we had machetes, spears and shields made from dried animal hides. So when the Colonialists rolled up on our shores and saw this they thought, why trade while we can just point our guns at them and take whatever we want and kill whoever would try and stop us. Turns out it’s pretty easy to get someone to do your bidding after threatening to kill them and their whole community. So one after the other Africans were loaded onto ships, literally stockpiled to be used and sold.

Colonialists became vastly wealthy. I mean they were getting natural resources for next to nothing (okay the whips, chains, guns and boats big enough to carry as much stuff as possible weren’t free) and to top it all off free slave labour, then selling their products for a hefty profit. They were raking it in big at our expense.

Erosion of our culture. Communities were split up and others erased from existence all together. During the scramble and partition of Africa, colonialists paid no mind to the people that lived there. Clans were destroyed, communities split up and missionaries had us abandon practices that they considered backward. Communities that resisted, in some instances, had their entire villages burnt down. In West Africa, however, the French adopted the indirect method of rule, which involved assimilating Africans. This meant abandoning their language, beliefs, culture and adopting the ways of the French, but this seemed better than the alternative.

Africans were displaced from their land and concentrated into small settlements. This led to terrible living conditions and spread of diseases. White colonialist settlers accumulated huge tracts of land which after independence resulted to one of the worst land inequalities in the world, and lets not forget about apartheid.

We were dragged into a war that didn’t concern us. Hundreds of thousands of Africans were asked to “volunteer” to fight in WW2 and those that didn’t “volunteer” were forced to fight, as if they had a choice.

They forever altered our course of development. Europeans had the opportunity to go through the agrarian revolution then the industrial revolution and then proceed into the modern age. Some African communities were just beginning their agrarian revolution; we had started keeping animals, and adopted farming. We had even just started transitioning from barter trade to using our simple currencies (shells, beads, gold). I mean this was a burgeoning economy in its infancy when the Europeans decided to mess all that up.

Neo-colonialism. After colonization, the Europeans could no longer take whatever they wanted, we could now trade with Europeans. However there was a catch, we could only trade with our colonial masters. This eliminated competition (so how much you wanna bet we were getting a raw deal?). Another stipulation was that, we could only export raw materials thereby inhibiting the rate at which our local African industries could develop. Furthermore, there was to be preferential treatment to the colonialist settlers who chose to remain in the former colonies, from tax exemptions to allowing them to keep the huge tracts of land they had acquired for themselves.

8 0
3 years ago
To what extent, if any, has the court promoted both the common good and individual liberty
vesna_86 [32]
<span>The Court has always had to balance the common good (the good of the community, or the public as a whole), with individual liberties (the rights of individuals). With each amendment that specifically deals with civil liberties, there are necessary exceptions to accommodate the needs of the whole. An example of this would be the first amendment individual right to speech, with the exception of hate speech, which injures the common good.</span>
4 0
4 years ago
According to psychoanalytic theory, the bases for the development of mental disorders are.
Natasha2012 [34]

Answer:

Psychoanalytic theory concentrates on awareness levels combined with our experiences in early childhood that together can form the basis of certain mental disorders.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Michael is a college student whose grades are getting worse with every passing semester. he explains to his guidance counselor t
    5·1 answer
  • How many illegal immigrants are in the us?
    13·1 answer
  • Which class of hard hats will protect you from electrical shock?
    13·2 answers
  • Scores between 75 and 25 were reported for a given data set of 30 scores. In this instance, the range would be calculated by ___
    6·1 answer
  • The primary political authority in society is the state. true or false.
    15·2 answers
  • The Federal agency primarily responsible for protecting our environment from contamination by hazardous materials releases is:
    7·1 answer
  • Describe the Sumerians' technological advancements in the area of warfare. What effects do you think these advancements had on b
    6·2 answers
  • What is election rigging?
    13·1 answer
  • FOR ANY MUSLIMS OR PEOPLE WHO KNOW ABOUT THE MUSLIM RELIGION PLEASE HELP
    5·1 answer
  • Please help me because i dont have read the book
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!