Portability should be the answer
<span>Tony did not breach a contract because it was all up to Lorene and who she wanted to go with. Lorene is not obligated to go with either. Although Bill spent most of his allowance, he could still ask someone else, sell his ticket and or even go by himself. I do not think Tony could be held liable even if he knew. It was not a nice thing to flake on Bill, but ultimately, it was Lorene's decision to make.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is: soldiering.
Explanation:
American economist Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856-1915) in his book "<em>The principles of Scientific Management</em>" (1911) described the term soldiering to refer as the act by which individuals decrease the efficiency of their duties at work in purpose because of different adverse situations arose such as few wages incentives or the belief that by increasing productivity the less productive workers could be affected through lay-offs.
I believe the lowest tier is District Court.
Answer:
Product A, then Product C and finally Product B
Explanation:
The unit profit = Selling price per unit - Variable cost per unit - Fixed cost per unit
Unit Profit of product A = $21 - $11 - $5 = $5
Unit Profit of product B = $12 - $7 - $3 = $2
Unit Profit of product C = $32 - $18 - $9 = $5
The profit of each product in 1 machine hour = 1 hour/ Machine hours per unit * Unit Profit
Profit of Product A in 1 hour using machine = 1/0.2 * $5 = $25
Profit of Product B in 1 hour using machine = 1/0.5*$2 = $4
Profit of Product C in 1 hour using machine = 1/0.2* $5 = $25
Product A & Product C have same profit in 1 hour machine, then we have to consider Direct labor hours per unit which product A is 0.4 while product C is 0.7. It means Product C is more costly in direct labour than Product A.
In short, then the ranking of the products from the most profitable to the least profitable use of the constrained resource is Product A, then Product C and finally Product B
