Answer:
Carnegie and Rockefeller both believed that the person who has a lot should give out to those who have less, and not stingy with the money. The rich man who is not sharing his wealth is the disgraced man.
Explanation:
<u>Carnegie has once stated, “He who dies rich, dies disgraced." This means that the one that has so much money that he can’t spend until his death so that he dies clutching on that money should be ashamed</u><u>. </u>Carnegie wanted to share his wealth and did not think it is fair that he has so much while some people have nothing. His moral obligation dictated him to share his money and let other people benefit from it.
<u>Rockefeller followed his example and decided to spend the fortune helping others as well. </u>Both industrials felt it is the only ethical thing to do if someone is as rich as they are.
<u>These feelings had also to do with their religious learnings and the faith that a good, honest religious man should always share with others who have less. </u>
Answer:The primary goal of Columbus's expedition was to find riches and conquer and exploit the new lands. Although various indigenous peoples had been settled in the Americas long before Columbus arrived, Columbus's goal was to pillage the land for riches regardless of who stood in his way.
European explorations led to the Columbian Exchange and an increase in international trade. European nations competed for colonies. The European economy underwent major changes. Today, as in the days of mercantilism, some groups want to restrict global trade to protect certain jobs and industries from competition.
The British were able to take control of India mainly because India was not united. The British signed treaties and made military and trading alliances with many of the independent states that made up India. ... They often left the local princes in charge of the various parts of India.The British were able to take control of India mainly because India was not united. The British signed treaties and made military and trading alliances with many of the independent states that made up India. ... They often left the local princes in charge of the various parts of India.
Slaves were punished by whipping, shackling, hanging, beating, burning, mutilation, branding, and imprisonment. Punishment was often meted out in response to disobedience or perceived infractions, but sometimes abuse was performed to re-assert the dominance of the master (or overseer) over the slave.
Explanation:
The answer to this statement whether if it is true or false is that, it is false. It is because self-regulated people can create an environment that produces trust and fairness but because self-regulated people tend to be more controlling to their behavior and emotions, it does not necessarily that they can only produce fairness. While political behavior can be reduced based on some instances but it does not necessarily impact of the behavior and infighting to be reduced within the instance though productivity is high.
A yes or no question such as, "do you like dogs" yes or no...
requiring your opinion as well.
