Some researchers claim that more innocent individuals have been wrongly convicted due to inaccuracy of eyewitness testimony is common than all other causes combined.
- Eyewitness testimony is a word used in law. It alludes to a description provided by individuals about an occasion they were present for. For instance, they can be asked to describe a crime or a car accident they saw during a trial. This includes information about the crime scene, the offenders' identities, etc.
- Studies have indicated that roughly half of all wrongful convictions are caused by false eyewitness testimony. When Ohio State University researchers looked at hundreds of false convictions, they found that about 52 percent of the errors were due to inaccuracies made by eyewitnesses.
Learn more about Eyewitness testimony from here :brainly.com/question/26651069
#SPJ4
I think your answer will be to 'soak up.'
Answer:
Noise
Explanation:
Noise can be described as a type of sound that causes distraction; this sound can be generated from various sources. It is a major hurdle to active listening as it disrupts an individual's ability to understand the message that is being communicated correctly.
Active listening requires an environment that is free from any type of strange sound which is capable of placing a barrier to proper communication.
In the scenario described above, the sound coming from the campus landscaper that was mowing the lawn is an example of noise. This sound coming from the lawnmower hinders the audience from understanding the message that is being passed during the student's presentation.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.
However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.
As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.
Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.
It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.
Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.
