Economy I do lol can you give an exploration please
Answer:
When Howard Zinn showed us that America did nothing to stop the development of fascism in Italy and Spain, he shows us that the American government of the time was not against fascism as a political movement, but specifically against abuse and racial violence carried out by the Nazis in Germany and Europe.
Explanation:
Howard Zinn was an American historian of Jewish origin, who through his works tried to explain the origins of the authoritarian movements in Europe and the American participation in World War II.
Through his theory, Zinn explains that America and the politicians of the time did not see the fascist movement as a danger or an enemy, understood as a corporatist, personalist, nationalist and socialist government. That is to say, they did not see said political organization as a danger, unlike what happened with communism, which they did identify as an imminent evil. Now, as soon as the question in Germany turned into violence against ethnic and cultural minorities, America began to take measures against these groups, no longer based on their political organization but on the racist and criminal violence of their acts.
Following a meeting of the two heads of government in Newfoundland, U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill issued the Atlantic Charter as a joint declaration on August 14, 1941. The U.S. and British war objectives were laid out in great detail in the Atlantic Charter.
<h3>How were FDR and Churchill related to one another?</h3>
In the early 1940s, when Churchill was still first lord of the admiralty, FDR began the lengthy correspondence that would eventually lead to their close working friendship. The purpose of the initial interaction was to inspire a neutral America to become more active in its fight against the axis.
<h3>What did FDR and Churchill differ on?</h3>
FDR wanted the Allies to launch a massive invasion of northern France as a follow-up to their growing dominance over the battlefields of North Africa. Churchill was in favor of launching an all-out assault on the "soft underbelly" of the Third Reich through Italy or the Balkans.
To learn more about British war here
brainly.com/question/932211
#SPJ1
7. The Anti-Federalists. In the ratification debate, the Anti-Federalists opposed to the Constitution. They complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights. ... One faction opposed the Constitution because they thought stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states. 8. One of the major compromises in the Constitutional Convention was between the small states and big states. The small states wanted each state to have the same number of representatives in Congress. The big states wanted representation based on population.
9. Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.
he made the government more lawful. hope this helps
