Answer:
developed
Explanation: that would be the most sense/best answer.
Explanation:
The witness's testimony is inadmissible.
Under Federal Rule 804(b)(1), the testimony of a witness who is unavailable, given at another hearing, is admissible in a subsequent trial if there is sufficient similarity of parties and issues so that the opportunity to develop testimony or cross-examination at the prior hearing was meaningful.
The former testimony is admissible upon any trial of the same subject matter. The party against whom the testimony is offered or, in civil cases, the party's predecessor in interest must have been a party in the former action. "Predecessor in interest" includes one in a privity relationship with the party, such as grantor-grantee, testator-executor, life tenant-remainder man, and joint tenants.
These requirements are intended to ensure that the party against whom the testimony is offered (or a predecessor in interest in a civil case) had an adequate opportunity and motive to cross-examine the witness.
In the civil suit here at issue, the survivors of the victim were not parties to the criminal case, nor were they in privity with any such party. (The parties to that case were the defendant and the government.) These survivors, who are the plaintiffs in the instant litigation, are the parties against whom the testimony of the witness is being offered. Because they were not parties to the action in which the witness testified, they had no opportunity to cross-examine him. Even if the government had a similar motive to cross-examine the witness as do the plaintiffs in the current action, that is not sufficient to make the government a predecessor in interest to the plaintiffs. Consequently, the testimony of the witness does not come within the former testimony exception to the hearsay rule, and the testimony is inadmissible hearsay.
A victim and his former business.
Mutualism is an ecological relationship where two-member benefits (Option 2).
<h3>What is an ecological relationship?</h3>
An ecological relationship is an association between two or more species, which may have positive, negative or neutral outcomes.
Mutualism is a symbiotic ecological relationship because both species are benefited from such interaction.
In conclusion, mutualism is an ecological relationship where two-member benefits (Option 2).
Learn more about Mutualism here:
brainly.com/question/2752810
#SPJ1
Answer:
Then the Speaker of the House takes the presidency, and the President pro temp ore of the Senate becomes Vice President.
Explanation:
