Answer: Party B
Explanation:
Even though verbal agreements are enforceable by law, written agreements take precedent because they are more explicit than verbal agreements.
The written agreement will therefore be followed in this case and according to this agreement, A will be punished for the proposed action.
If A had tangible proof that a subsequent agreement was reached that would void them of said punishment, they should present it. If they do not, B would prevail.
The ability of an individual or group to carry out a particular economic activity more efficiently than another individual or group
Answer:
The stocks complement up to at least one. If one in all the stocks isn't mislaid, then the equation might be grieve from good multiple correlation. The factors might not have a ceteris paribus clarification, because it is not possible to vary one stocks although holding all of the opposite stocks mounted.
Answer and Explanation:
Given that the dividend will grow at 20% for two years and then a constant 6% at third year
1st year dividend at 20%= $3
Present value of the dividend for the first year=PV factor at 15%(from table) = $2.61
2nd year dividend at 20% = $3.60
Present value of the dividend for the second year = PV factor at 15%(from table) $2.72
3rd year dividend at 6% growth rate =
$42.40
Present value of the dividend for the third year = PV factor at 15% = $32.06
Current price of the stock =$2.61+$2.72+$32.06
=$37.39
No. They are not the same.
Pls mark brainliest.
