Answer:
Explanation:
Agnatha (Ancient Greek is a superclass of jawless fish in the phylum Chordata, subphylum Vertebrata, consisting of both present (cyclostomes) and extinct (conodonts and ostracoderms) species. The group is sister to all vertebrates with jaws, known as gnathostomes.
Recent molecular data, both from as well as embryological data[8] strongly supports the hypothesis that living agnathans, the cyclostomes, are monophyletic.
The oldest fossil agnathans appeared in the Cambrian, and two groups still survive today: the lampreys and the hagfish, comprising about 120 species in total. Hagfish are considered members of the subphylum Vertebrata, because they secondarily lost vertebrae; before this event was inferred from molecular and developmental data, the group Craniata was created by Linnaeus (and is still sometimes used as a strictly morphological descriptor) to reference hagfish plus vertebrates. In addition to the absence of jaws, modern agnathans are characterised by absence of paired fins; the presence of a notochord both in larvae and adults; and seven or more paired gill pouches. Lampreys have a light sensitive pineal eye (homologous to the pineal gland in mammals). All living and most extinct Agnatha do not have an identifiable stomach or any appendages. Fertilization and development are both external. There is no parental care in the Agnatha class. The Agnatha are ectothermic or cold blooded, with a cartilaginous skeleton, and the heart contains 2 chambers.
While a few scientists still regard the living agnathans as only superficially similar, and argue that many of these similarities are probably shared basal characteristics of ancient vertebrates, recent classification clearly place hagfish (the Myxini or Hyperotreti) with the lampreys (Hyperoartia) as being more closely related to each other than either is to the jawed fishes.
Answer:original answers
Explanation:
This speech, reasoning, and characterization of dystopian societies by thinkers and artists serve The critical purpose. Dystopian art and literature often make the new real-world cultural, economic or political interest, e.g., the ability of government or large corporations, to the extreme to make the depiction of a dystopian society. Such the fictional portrayal serves as a warning to the community; it offers a means to distinguish the current state of affairs against the perfect situation to help ensure that the world doesn't become that nightmare. For instance, Aldous Huxley's people New globe discourages us that cognition, discipline and yet spirit-all of which exist believed by most to remain intrinsically 'good'-can be used to create the illusion of a utopia that's, in fact, a dystopia.
I think the sentence that uses it correctly is the last one.
Answer:
I'm glad you asked!
Explanation:
The answer is they weighed too much.It says the problem was fixed by them using lighter things.The opposite of lighter things is heavier things.
Answer:
Explanation:
I don't think it does. People do what they are going to do. The fact that something is governed by destiny makes no difference to what will be done.
If I must answer the question as it is written, then there is some chance that you will do something against the rules of society because you now believe that you are destined to do it. In some ways it makes sense. Great acts that are good and do not conform to society's practices often result in a benefit to mankind.
