1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
amm1812
2 years ago
11

Assume that a Parent owns 80 percent of a Subsidiary that has 6 percent preferred stock outstanding with a reported par value of

$720,000. Aside from the preferred dividends, no other dividends are paid (i.e., no dividends are paid to the common shareholders). The Parent owns none of the preferred stock. Assume that the Subsidiary reports net income of $117,000. During the year, the Parent company reported $261,000 of (pre-consolidation) income from its own operations (i.e., prior to any equity method adjustments by the Parent company). Compute the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest and the amount of net income attributable to the controlling interest.
Business
1 answer:
DiKsa [7]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Consolidated net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest $14,760

Consolidated net income attributable to the controlling interest $320,040

Explanation:

Computation of the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest and the amount of net income attributable to the controlling interest.

CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME attributable to the noncontrolling interest

First step is to find the Divide amount

Dividend =6% x $720,000

Dividend= $43,200

Second Step is to find the Net Income from Subsidiary

Net Income from Subsidiary= $117,000-$43,200

Net Income from Subsidiary=$73,800

Last step is to calculate consolidated net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest

Noncontrolling interest =$73,800 x 20%

Noncontrolling interest = $14,760

NET INCOME attributable to the controlling interest

First step is to find the controlling interest amount

Controlling interest=80% x $73,800

Controlling interest= $59,040

Last step is to find the Parent company income

Parent company income= $261,000 + $59,040

Parent company income= $320,040

Therefore Consolidated net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest is $14,760 while the Consolidated net income attributable to the controlling interest is $320,040

You might be interested in
Laws governing sales are only enacted when the rights of an organization are infringed upon
luda_lava [24]
False because I know give brainlessly because I so swag and cool
7 0
2 years ago
Evaluate the following investment options by comparing their risk and liquidity: buying a franchise real estate (buying property
Gala2k [10]

Answer:

Buying a franchise: For me, this is the riskiest investment, because the success of the business depends on the product or service it sells. If there is no demand for the product or service, the business will go under. This investment is also highly illiquid—in addition, finding someone willing to buy a business is difficult.

Mutual fund: This is the least risky of the three investment options. It is highly liquid compared to buying a franchise or real estate. Mutual fund investors can easily cash in their investments by selling the units they hold in a fund at the current market price.

Real estate: Real estate is a risky investment. First, property prices can fall in a depressed housing market. Second, real estate properties are illiquid. They can’t be sold quickly for a good price, especially in times of recession in the housing market or in the overall economy.

A mutual fund is the best of the three investment options for me, for the following reasons:

I can invest small amounts of money regularly and get higher returns on the investment than I would from a savings account. Also, this is a highly liquid investment. In case of a financial emergency, I can quickly sell my mutual fund units at their current market price.

Real estate is currently both a risky and illiquid investment, because of poor market conditions.

Buying a franchise is not a good option for me, because I don’t plan to go into business. In any case, I don’t have the money to make this investment.

Explanation: PLATO

8 0
2 years ago
A firm has earnings before interest and taxes of $27,130, net income of $16,220, and taxes of $5,450 for the year. While the fir
grin007 [14]

Answer:

The correct answer is e. -$4,940.

Explanation:

This problem requires us to calculate the amount of the cash flow to creditors. The cash flow to creditor means all payment made to creditors in form of interest payment or principal payment. The amount borrowed is deducted from it. The detail calculation is given below.

Interest =  Earning before interest and taxes - Net income - Taxes

Interest = 27,130 - 16,220 - 5,450

Interest = $ 5,460

Cash flow to creditors = 31,600 + 5,460 - 42,000 = -$ 4,940

6 0
3 years ago
Your firm is thinking about investing ​$200 comma 000200,000 in the overhaul of a manufacturing cell in a lean environment. Reve
Zepler [3.9K]

Answer:

EAW = -$17,545.71

Explanation:

initial investment = $200,000

cash inflows;

  • Year 1 = $33,000
  • Year 2 = $44,000
  • Year 3 = $55,000
  • Year 4 = $66,000
  • Year 5 = $77,000
  • Year 6 = $88,000
  • Year 7 = $99,000
  • Year 8 = $110,000
  • Year 9 = $132,000

cash outflows:

  • Year 1 = $20,000
  • Year 2 = $30,000
  • Year 3 = $40,000
  • Year 4 = $50,000
  • Year 5 = $60,000
  • Year 6 = $70,000
  • Year 7 = $80,000
  • Year 8 = $90,000
  • Year 9 = $100,000

EAW = equivalent annual worth = equivalent annual benefits - equivalent annual costs

to determine the EAB we must first find the PV of the cash inflows using a financial calculator = $408,348.84

EAB = (PV x r) / [1 - (1 + r)⁻ⁿ] = ($408,348.84 x 10%) / [1 - (1 + 10%)⁻⁹] = $70,905.91

to determine the EAC we must first find the PV of the cash outflows (including initial outlay) using a financial calculator = $509,395

EAC = (PV x r) / [1 - (1 + r)⁻ⁿ] = ($509,395 x 10%) / [1 - (1 + 10%)⁻⁹] = $88,451.62

EAW = $70,905.91 - $88,451.62 = -$17,545.71

5 0
3 years ago
john Hayes and Lynn Magosian, auditors for a public accounting firm, went to lunch at the Bay View Restaurant in San Francisco.
zloy xaker [14]

Answer:

John is correct but Lynn isn't

Explanation:

John is correct because he left his coat with the coatroom attendant under the premise that it would be properly looked after and returned to him when he was done having lunch at the restaurant. However, Lynn just left her coat lying around under no ones care or supervision, there wasn't a predetermined agreement that anyone would be responsible for watching it on her behalf, therefore I don't think she is has the right to sue.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Connolly Company produces two types of lamps, classic and fancy, with unit contribution margins of $13 and $21, respectively. Ea
    5·1 answer
  • 3. According to the National Automobile Dealers Association, a single dealership may employ people with as many as 57 different
    9·1 answer
  • The Tolar Corporation has 400 obsolete desk calculators that are carried in inventory at a total cost of $26,800. If these calcu
    7·1 answer
  • Gitano Products operates a job-order costing system and applies overhead cost to jobs on the basis of direct materials used in p
    10·1 answer
  • Stew Beauf is a self-employed surfboard-maker in 2019. His Schedule C net income is $152,800 for the year. He also has a part-ti
    5·1 answer
  • The top salary you can make.
    14·1 answer
  • Hi anyone wanna t alk
    7·1 answer
  • Describe why it is important to understand how businesses impact you.
    5·1 answer
  • 1. What are the purposes of a checking account? ​
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP URGENT Use what you know from your reading and explain how the Scopes Trial was a reflection of the 1920s cultural c
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!