I would describe the taking of a twenty minute bath during a drought extremely obtuse and unintelligent, during a drought you'd want to save water, not waste it taking excessively long baths.
Justice Thurgood Marshall looks at the first three words, “We the people,” as evidence that the Constitution is not static and is, in fact, developing/changing with the times. For instance, Justice Thurgood Marshall says that “We the people” did not actually mean everybody when it was written. The words “We the people” actually excluded African Americans, Native Americans, women, and even whites if they did not own land. However, the words "We the people" eventually evolved to mean <em>all</em> United States citizens regardless of heritage, gender, class, etc. Thus, this is evidence that the Constitution evolves with time with the nature of the nation for which it was written.
Either of these chances can build tension and suspense
It seems that you question lacked necessary details and it is quite vague to comprehend. Please fix the said question first and also include other details that might help us with it. If it is done, feel free to get back to me and I will do my best to help you. Have a great day!
Answer:
D) The narrator is not part of the story but knows what one character is thinking and feeling.
Explanation:
When it comes to third-person perspective, it's told like: 'She wasn't sure why it happened or even where, but the news was spreading like a wildfire and she needed to get to the bottom of it. "No, I haven't" she responded.' It's told from one person's perspective, not from multiple. Of course, there are others but we don't know what any others are thinking unless they say what they are thinking or the character makes a guess what they are thinking.
