The correct option is "Rick has $6 and wants to buy an ice cream where he can get one scoop for $3, two scoops for $5, or three scoops for $6"
According to marginal analysis, it should be noted that optimal decision making has to do with actions that are taken by individuals, firms or government such that the marginal benefit is greater than the marginal cost.
Based on the options given, the correct option is that "Rick has $6 and wants to buy an ice cream where he can get one scoop for $3, two scoops for $5, or three scoops for $6".
In this case, Rick is analyzing his decisions in order to ensure that the marginal benefit is more then the marginal cost.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/2508491
Answer:
a. not admitted as evidence because it is hearsay.
Explanation:
Dominic's testimony of Francis conversation which was made out of court constitutes a hearsay evidence and hearsay evidences are inadmissible in the court of law. Hearsay or hearsay evidences are out-of-court statement made by a witness in court to prove the truth of a case.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
Among the choices the true statement is "<span>Judges are appointed at the federal level, and the system for selecting judges differs by state government."</span>
The correct answer is by birth and naturalization.
If you are born to parents at least one of which is a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, then you automatically gain a U.S. citizenship which means gain a citizenship through birth. While it does not matter whether you were born in the USA or in another foreign country.
Answer:
Mens Rea
Explanation:
Mens rea is defined as a mental element of an individual's intention so as to commit crime; or the knowledge that his or her action or the lack of action would seriously cause a crime that is committed.
In the context, Manuel defense is Mens Rea which results the prosecution fail to prove one or more than one elements of the crime committed. It usually create a doubt or leaves a doubt in the jury's mind which results in obstructing a prosecution from the meeting its burden of any such proof.