1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NISA [10]
3 years ago
13

Which best describes why no binding agreement about global warming was reached at the Copenhagen Summit?

History
2 answers:
valina [46]3 years ago
5 0
<span>The best statement that describes why no binding agreement about global warming was reached at the Copenhagen Summit is that </span><span>E. Each conference has been held during leadership changes in the major countries.</span>
faust18 [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A. Poor and wealthy countries had different concerns.

Explanation:

This is one of the explanations for why there was no binding agreement about global warming in the Copenhagen Summit. The discussions in this summit often reflected a deep division between rich and poor nations. While rich nations were dealing with conservative delegations and the impact of the 2008 recession, the poorer countries were concerned with "climate justice" and their ability to continue growing.

You might be interested in
BEST ANSWER GETS BRAINLEIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Svet_ta [14]
Hello there!

The reason we<span> </span>have this form of government goes back to something called checks and balances.

Checks and balances in our government are very important and regulate power. Our government was designed so that not just one branch was to receive all the power in our federal government.

I'll give you an example:

Say the Legislative branch (Congress) made a bill that said, "Anyone named John cannot say anything that dishonors the government." This is where the President (Executive branch) can come in and either veto or sign this bill. If he vetoes, then Congress can go back and revote. If he signs it, then this bill becomes federal law.

All is going dandy, and then the Supreme Court (Judicial) comes in and says, "I don't think that this is a Constitutional law." After review (it is called Judicial Review) they come to the consensus that this law violates the 1st Amendment. After they vote, they determine that this law is unconstitutional, and basically kill that law.

I hope this helps!
Brady
6 0
3 years ago
Explain why Madoff created the Ponzi scheme despite not even needing the extra<br> money.?
Stels [109]

Answer:

He funded redemptions by attracting new investors and their capital, but was unable to maintain the fraud when the market turned sharply lower in late 2008. ... In 2009, at age 71, Madoff pleaded guilty to 11 federal felony counts, including securities fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, perjury, and money laundering.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How could a failed country affect the standard of living in a region
puteri [66]

Answer:

no

Explanation:

disintegratedto a point

6 0
2 years ago
1. Why did many Americans feel that the result of the 1824 elections was fraudulent?
uysha [10]
1. The correct answer is <span>C. Andrew Jackson won the majority of electoral votes, but he did not win the most popular votes; therefore he did not become president. This is the first (and so far, the last) time in American history that the person who won the majority of electoral votes didn't become president. Jackson would become president in 1829.

2. The correct answer is </span><span>A. It was possible that an unqualified person could receive a government job. The spoils system was deeply ingrained in the ideology of Jackson's supporters. It happens when the newly elected government gives sinecures and government jobs to its most ardent followers, thus rewarding them for their loyalty. Of course, the natural consequence is that the most loyal people get the best jobs, regardless of their competence or qualifications.

3. The correct answer is </span><span>B. men who did not own property. But in practice, this meant all white men. At this point in history, it was far too early to talk about black men or women getting suffrage. Before Jackson, only white men who had property could vote. He wanted to put a stop to it, advocating the rights of "the common man", against the relics of old aristocratic traditions.</span>
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is e-mail the best way to deliver this message? Explain why or why not, and then note any further actions the sender should take
Nana76 [90]
Email is one of th best ways to deliver messages because it has a subject and you can add more things and if you work for a job most of the time workers will awnser their emails daily. Hope this helps if so brainlist?
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • After all expenses are subtracted, the amount of money left after a sale is called a: -share
    14·1 answer
  • Again I’m very stupid as I can see
    10·1 answer
  • In which neighborhoods were immigrants who stayed in cities most likely to settle?
    12·1 answer
  • Reynolds's Political Map of the United States shows free states, slave states, and areas open to be free or slave after the repe
    14·2 answers
  • Examples of how Congress oversees the power of the executive branch is its power to (5 points) Select one: a. approve presidenti
    12·2 answers
  • During World War I, the Congress passed the Sedition Act in 1918. Why did many Americans consider this Act to be a violation of
    15·1 answer
  • How many continents were included in the roman empire ?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not true of the relationship between the Renaissance and the newspaper
    7·1 answer
  • In the 1824 presidential election, Andrew Jackson
    10·2 answers
  • Please help it’s due today
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!