1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Novosadov [1.4K]
3 years ago
7

Another name for an indirect democracy is a __________ democracy.

History
2 answers:
OleMash [197]3 years ago
7 0

The answer is representative democracy, which is the exercise of political power by the electoral population made indirectly (as opposed to direct democracy), but through its representatives, appointed by them, with a mandate to act on their behalf and by their authority, that is, legitimized by popular sovereignty.


stellarik [79]3 years ago
5 0

Another name for in indirect democracy is a representative democracy in which people elect officials to represent them in government

You might be interested in
What did the Homestead Act of 1862 offer western settlers?
Mekhanik [1.2K]

The Homestead act promised free land to settlers on the western frontier. It promised ownership of a 160-acre tract of public land to a citizen or head of a family who had resided on and cultivated the land for five years after the initial claim. $6.00. ... The Homestead Act would provide settlers to occupy the new lands.

Please mark as the brainiest!!!!!!!

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone help me with this? Thanks.
ddd [48]

Answer:

To build Fort Prince George as a way to  protect British Territory

Explanation:

I know History I guess?

3 0
2 years ago
Imagine that an exchange student from China visits your class. While your teacher discusses how the United States has a limited
lubasha [3.4K]

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

Hope this is accurate and helps! :D

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was life in cities so difficult during urbanization
natima [27]

While the work was dangerous and difficult, many Americans were willing to leave behind the declining prospects of preindustrial agriculture in the hope of better wages in industrial labor. Furthermore, problems ranging from famine to religious persecution led a new wave of immigrants to arrive from central, eastern, and southern Europe, many of whom settled and found work near the cities where they first arrived. Immigrants sought solace and comfort among others who shared the same language and customs, and the nation’s cities became an invaluable economic and cultural resource.


source: https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-ushistory2os2xmaster/chapter/urbanization-and-its-challenges/

5 0
3 years ago
Explain what gave other Europeans the courage to begin fighting against their own oppressive leaders.
yan [13]
This chapter, which analyses the theories of cultural action which develop from antidialogical and dialogical matrices, will make frequent reference to points presented in the previous chapters, either to expand these points or to clarify new affirmations.

I shall start by reaffirming that humankind, as beings of the praxis, differ from animals, which are beings of pure activity. Animals do not consider the world; they are immersed in it. In contrast, human beings emerge from the world, objectify it, and in so doing can understand it and transform it with their labor.

Animals, which do not labor, live in a setting which they cannot transcend. Hence, each animal species lives in the context appropriate to it, and these contexts, while open to humans, cannot communicate among themselves.

But human activity consists of action and reflection: it is praxis; it is transformation of the world. And as praxis, it requires theory to illuminate it. Human activity is theory and practice; it is reflection and action. It cannot, as I stressed in chapter 2, be reduced to either verbalism or activism.

Lenin's famous statement: "Without a revolutionary theory there can be no revolutionary movement"1 means that a revolution is achieved with neither verbalism nor adtivism, but rather with praxis, that is, with reflection and action directed at the structures to be transformed. The revolutionary effort to transform these structures radically cannot designate its leaders as its thinkers and the oppressed as mere doers.

If true commitment to the people, involving the transformation of the reality by which they are oppressed, requires a theory of transforming action, this theory cannot fail to assign the people a fundamental role in the transformation process. The leaders cannot treat the oppressed as mere activists to be denied the opportunity of reflection and allowed merely the illusion of acting, whereas in fact they would continue to be manipulated—and in this case by the presumed foes of manipulation.

The leaders do bear the responsibility for coordination and, at times, direction—but leaders who deny praxis to the oppressed thereby invalidate their own praxis. By imposing their word on others, they falsify that word and establish a contradiction between their methods and their objectives. If they are truly committed to liberation, their action and reflection cannot proceed without the action and reflection of others.

Revolutionary praxis must stand opposed to the praxis of the dominant elites, for they are by nature antithetical. Revolutionary praxis cannot tolerate an absurd dichotomy in which the praxis of the people is merely that of following the leaders decisions—a dichotomy reflecting the prescriptive methods of the dominant elites. Revolutionary praxis is a unity, and the leaders cannot treat the oppressed as their possession.

Manipulation, sloganizing, "depositing," regimentation, and prescription cannot be components of revolutionary praxis, precisely because they are components of the praxis of domination. In order to dominate, the dominator has no choice but to deny true praxis to the people, deny them the right to say their own word and think their own thoughts. He and she cannot act dialogically; for to do so would mean either that they had relinquished their power to dominate and joined the cause of the oppressed, or had lost that power through miscalculation.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the responsibility of the tribal assembly in the early roman republic?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not true of the expansion of Islam into India?
    11·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the interstate commerce act (1887) and the sherman antitrust act (1890)?
    12·1 answer
  • Why was direct election of senators a necessary change?
    14·1 answer
  • Who was shivajis tutor​
    10·1 answer
  • Article 2 of the constitution describes presidential powers
    15·1 answer
  • 20. Why did France, a Catholic country, help the Protestants during the Thirty Years' War?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of public policy?
    10·1 answer
  • Why was luther summoned to the diet of worms
    12·1 answer
  • In response to the US invasion of Cambodia, congress
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!