The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) declares that the Constitution, federal legislation adopted in accordance with it, and treaties signed in accordance with its authority are the "supreme Law of the Land" and supersede any conflicting state laws.
It stipulates that state constitutions are subordinate to the supreme law and that state courts must abide by it.
Thus, Option A is correct.
<h3>Why did the Supremacy Clause come into being?</h3>
The provision gave the Supreme Court the power to support the creation of a robust federal government. The U.S. Constitution's Supremacy Clause was added because the Articles of Confederation did not have one. According to the Articles, state laws could not and did not take precedence over federal legislation.
For more information about Supremacy Clause refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/13839329
#SPJ4
Answer:
King's actions helped pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The law ended the legal separation of people by race in public places. The act also banned job discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion or national origin. King and other activists watched the president sign the law.
Explanation:
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The four stages of Operation Contribution are
1. Internal Neutrality
2. External Neutrality
3. Internal Supportive
4. External Supportive
The right answer is C: Participating in an interest group. An interest, lobby or advocacy group consists of an organized group of people that, seeking a common public interest, get together and work jointly in order to advocate for and pursue that interest before the authorities.
Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
It is always very important to deliver speeches that are very unique, addressing the context or the situation at that time. When the speech is being delivered using another unrelated concept created by someone else, the speaker may likely seem very insincere before the audience, and they may also not be able to understand why the speaker talks quite differently from the issue at hand. The listeners can as well lack engagement with his speech as seen in the case of Walter.