1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naddika [18.5K]
4 years ago
5

Which technological advances made World War I different from past wars? Check all that apply trench warfare poison gas computers

submarines radar machine guns
History
2 answers:
Sindrei [870]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

  • Trench warfare
  • poison gas
  • submarines
  • machine guns

Explanation:

Artillery - Large firearms, called cannons, were improved during World War I including hostile to air ship weapons to shoot down foe planes. Most of the losses in the war were dispensed utilizing ordnance. Some enormous cannons weapons could dispatch shells about 80 miles.  

Machine gun - The assault rifle was improved during the war. It was made a lot lighter and simpler to move around.  

Chemical weapons - World War I additionally acquainted concoction weapons with fighting. Germany initially utilized chlorine gas to harm clueless Allied troops. Afterward, the more perilous mustard gas was created and utilized by the two sides. Before the finish of the war, troops were furnished with gas covers and the weapon was less powerful.

Ede4ka [16]4 years ago
3 0

Trench warfare poison gas submarines machine guns

You might be interested in
Aztec society was strongly influenced by the?
almond37 [142]
<span> classic Mesoamerican civilization</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Which situation is NOT a potential consequence of unexpected expenses?
malfutka [58]

Answer:

The answer is  B. increased taxes

Explanation:

A reduction in budget funds doesn´t necessarily leads to higher taxes , there is no logical connection between the two phenomena.

7 0
3 years ago
For either Mapp v. Ohio or Miranda v. Arizona, describe the constitutional issue of the case, and explain how the court's ruling
Lubov Fominskaja [6]

The case <em>Miranda v. Arizona (1966)</em> was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in which the court established that prosecutors cannot use a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial, unless the person was informed of what is known as "Miranda warning," but voluntarily waived these rights.

A "Miranda warning" is an explanation given to people arrested that informs them of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning. It also informs them of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning. The court's ruling protect those accused of a crime because it prevents them from incriminating themselves. It also reminds them of the importance of an attorney for achieving a successful trial.

4 0
3 years ago
What evidence in the excerpt suggests that being a spy for the Americans could be deadly?
kvasek [131]

Answer:

Explanation:

In the excerpt, the evidence which suggests that being a spy for the American could be deadly is: 'That move probably saved him from hanging. '

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Spain send conquistadors to the Americas?
Semenov [28]
They wanted to captuer it
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why is it important to organize historical events in its chronical order
    6·1 answer
  • What did Kenyatta say about democracy?
    8·2 answers
  • Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government was made up of __________.
    5·2 answers
  • Working women experienced new freedoms in the progressive era because:
    5·1 answer
  • What is alfred beveridge's position about imperialism?
    11·1 answer
  • How did the American Revolution impact other countries?
    7·2 answers
  • The reason the eastern luxuries Were expensive.
    8·2 answers
  • If a runner jogs 3 miles west and then jogs 8 miles
    12·1 answer
  • During the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, three European nations-Spain, France, and England-
    8·1 answer
  • Which sentence best explains why critics argue against social welfare programs?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!