1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kiruha [24]
3 years ago
8

How did galloway’s plan solve the problem of colonial representation in parliament? how would the british ministers who advocate

d parliamentary supremacy have reacted to the plan?
History
1 answer:
Fofino [41]3 years ago
3 0

Galloway proposed the formation of an American colonial parliament to act with the Parliament of the Great Britain. The parliament would involve a President-General which would be chosen by the colonial congresses. Galloway’s plan would have retained the British Empire calm, while permitting the colonies to have their opinions over their peculiar matters. It was not acknowledged by the Congress, which directed to the divergence of argument with the extremists that increases the upper hand due to the presence of the Suffolk Resolves at the congress. It was beaten by a vote of six to five on October 1774.

You might be interested in
What was a major obstacle to drafting a new constitution at the Constitutional Convention of 1787?
arsen [322]

Answer: A. a disagreement between the states over representation in Congress.

The main disagreement was over whether representation would be the same for all states, or based on a state's population size.  Then there was also a question, for basing representation on population size, about whether slaves counted in a state's population or not.

The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise were worked out during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787 in order to resolve these issues.

  • The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states.  Initially, a unicameral (one-chamber) legislature was envisioned.  The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size.  The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation.  The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature.  Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population.  In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
  • The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery.  For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures.  (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.)   The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
4 0
3 years ago
Which BEST describes how a parliamentary democracy differs from a presidential democracy? A) The legislative branch in the presi
Scrat [10]
The best description in terms of how a parliamentary democracy differs from a presidential democracy would be that "<span>C) In a presidential democracy, political power is shared between state and federal governments," since in a Parliamentary government it is more based on districts. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The blank emphasize systematic experimentation as the most valid research method and resulted in development in mathematics, phy
Tju [1.3M]

Answer:

Option: B) Scientific revolution

Explanation:

The Scientific Revolution led in the development of modern science, which changed the view of seeing science with experiments and technology. It began during the 16th and 17th centuries when people saw nature separately rather than believing as the miracle of God. Mathematics, biology, chemistry, astronomy, physics were some of the fields in science that interested people.

6 0
3 years ago
Compare the rise of civilizations and rise of early world civilizations
mestny [16]
One is early the other is other is old
8 0
4 years ago
Is it important to distinguish between genocide and other atrocities? Why or why not?
Stella [2.4K]

Answer:

No, it is not. Genocide may be worse than bombing a Red Cross hospital, but none the less, these are still great atrocities.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • • which cultural practices are highlighted in wenda gu's united nations—china monument?
    7·1 answer
  • Which type of goods and/or services are typically provided by government?
    15·1 answer
  • Based on City, which of the following did ancient Roman city builders most likely value?
    11·1 answer
  • (TRUE OR FALSE)
    15·1 answer
  • What was one of the most significant contributions to history made by the ancient phoenicians?
    11·1 answer
  • Who can recommend me a good study app/site for the US history air test
    8·1 answer
  • Pls help me because which year did black poeple got out of salvly end
    9·1 answer
  • What cities and countries were<br> mentioned in the news this week?
    5·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer. Tracy applied for a home loan from her bank. The bank is willing to give her the loan but at a very h
    5·1 answer
  • Pls stop deleting my Q there is nothing wrong with it
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!