Answer:
The correct answer is Formal Benchmarking.
Explanation:
The English term "benchmark" comes from the words "bench" (bench, table) and "mark" (brand, sign). In the original meaning of English, the word compound could however be translated as a measure of quality. In other words, benchmarking is a way to determine how well a company performs, compared to others.
In order to be more competitive at present, it is necessary to use benchmarking since it provides strategies that allow identifying the best keys to the company's success, so that by implementing them the organization can be a leading and competitive company in a changing market and global in which business organizations currently have to see each other.
The majority of authors relate benchmarking with competitiveness and business improvement, being "the company" its natural scope. However, the potential benefits of its use make it considered in other areas, such as "public organizations", and at other levels, "sectoral" and "environment" (regional, national and international). This complicates the definition of the concept, since it is a tool that has multiple application possibilities, pursues different objectives in each case, and uses its own methodology in each area.
i think its computer assembly and repair.
Answer:
B. Cross-sectional data provides information about economic behavior at an instant in time, while time-series data provides information about how an economic variable behaves over time.
Explanation:
There are two types of data, transverse data and time series data. Cross-sectional data is data that exists at a single point in time. For example, data from an observational survey or sales from a firm. Time series data are data that require intertemporal analysis, such as a country's inflation and GDP data, which should be analyzed for evolution. In other words, time series data are analyzed in a manner dependent on the previous period. Current month's inflation depends on the previous month's inflation analysis.
Answer:
<u><em>But where do we go from here? </em></u>
It depends on the result of more government intervention on quality life standards.
<u><em>Do we need less or more government involvement? </em></u>
It depends on the problems that need to be addressed. For example, to address problems such inequality it is mandatory that the government gets involve and create laws to prevent it. But surely for more movement of capitals there is no need of higher government involvement.
<u><em>Is it a question of the quality of that involvement? </em></u>
Yes. If government has an effective involvement there is even desirable to have its intervention but if it complicates everything then is repeled.
<u><em>Could it be smarter rather than just less? </em></u>
Yes, because it is proved that the economy acts in an effective way to good policy making.
<u><em>How can the cost of government involvement decrease?</em></u>
In this aspect it is important to mention the environmental issues in nowadasy economy. If the measurement of what is defined as "cost" is understand in the long run as conservation and balance between nature and economic explotation of resources.
Jan needs bonds-based mutual funds as an investment in which he wants to earn the best rate of return. It mostly consists of individual bonds wherein it is compiled in a portfolio. A bond fund when then produced incomes from underlying bonds measured in incomes.
