Answer:
The cases were about racial segregation.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education(1954) was a Supreme Court case which ruled that children's racial segregation in government's schools was illegal. The decision by the Supreme court showed that everyone is equal despite their colour or religion.
Milliken v. Bradley(1974) was a Supreme Court case in the United States regarding the outlined desegregation of busing among public school students in Detroit. There was a plan to blend students of different races in United States public schools following the decision made in Brown v. Board of Education (1954). The decision was the opposite of the decision made in Brown v. Board of Education as segregation was encouraged.
The court refused to remedy unequal and separate education. Children need to learn together and understand each other. I believe voters who disagreed with the ruling could have made a peaceful protest regarding the decision made. Also, since the public schools were mainly funded by taxes, the people who opposed the decision could have refused to pay tax in order to voice their opinions on the issues.
A referendum held soon after the Battle of San Jacinto showed Texans favoring annexation by a vote of 3,277 to 93. The annexation question became one of the most controversial issues in American politics in the late 1830s and early 1840s. The issue was not Texas but slavery.
Answer:
Cuba's economy reforms from a comparative per-sepctive
B. the plaintiff. a cross-examination is when the other lawyer asks the witness questions
Answer:
In support of social responsibility
Explanation:
It is worth being socially responsible because companies that demonstrate this commitment <em>have the trust of the people and receive greater support in times of crisis, as consumers will continue to purchase their items regardless of the economic situation</em>. This fact represents stability and high value for companies since investors will see them as a safe business.
The manager must be the first to demonstrate the correct attitude towards social responsibility, <u>if the manager sees social responsibility as a simple requirement or administrative norm then he will not be able to promote the interest of the employees in developing the proposed strategy.
</u>
I am in favor of social responsibility because it generates benefits for society and the company, as it increases its reputation, fosters public confidence and improves the health of workers and individuals that make up society.
