The amount of territory the US currently has would have been completely different if the national government could only legislate based on what is written in the constitution.
A perfect example of this is the power to purchase land/territories from other countries. This was first done by Thomas Jefferson with the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. The US Constitution does not say that the president has the power to buy land from other countries. However, Jefferson said that this power was "implied" by the Constitution.
This idea of an implied power greatly changed the presidency/national government. Several presidents after Jefferson would follow his lead by making deals with countries for territory.
If it wasn't for this concept of implied powers, the US may not have grown to the 50 states we know it as today.
James VI was King of Scotland as James VI from 24 July 1567 and King of England and Ireland as James I from the union of Scottish and English crowns on 24 march 1603 until his death in 1625.There for He was the king that united the kingdoms.
Answer:
"A manufacturing process developed by mechanically moving the parts to the assembly work and moving the semi-finished assembly from work station to work station. This allows a finished product to be assembled faster and with less labor than by having workers carry parts to a stationary piece for assembly."
Explanation:
This is what i found. idk if it's the answer you're looking for but hope it helps!!
<span>Answer:
The Founding Fathers drew vigorously from English logician John Locke in building up America's First Principles: the acknowledgment of unalienable rights, the Social Compact, and restricted government. Locke wrote a few progressive scholarly pieces, particularly "A few Thoughts Concerning Education," "A Letter Concerning Toleration," and "An Essay Concerning Human Understanding." His most prominent work which was powerful to the Founders were his First and Second Treatise of Civil Government (1689). Locke safeguarded the Glorious Revolution of 1688, in the Second Treatise, where he clarified that in a condition of nature individuals were allowed to seek after and shield there claim intrigues which caused war. To escape war, the general population built up governments to secure peace. To Locke "no flexibility" existed without a Social Compact of laws, since "freedom is to be free from limitation and brutality from others; which can't be the place there is no law." Unlike his English contemporary Thomas Hobbes, Locke contended that where governments secured the unalienable privileges of people; they had no power past that which was important to ensure those rights. The Declaration of Independence (1776) and the Constitution of the United States (1789) mirrors his considerations in which the pilgrims based their entitlement to end political bonds with Great Britain whose oppressive King and Parliament had held on in preventing the rights from claiming the homesteaders who were British subjects.</span>
Answer:
I think that the answer is D.
Explanation:
Because I know that the League of Nations condemned the Italian invasion in 1935 and voted to impose economic sanctions on the aggressor.They also released both sides from responsibility. With the international community turning a blind eye to Italy's aggression because after World War I they wanted to maintain world peace.
