Answer:
The whole thing is a case of kill or be killed, essentially self defense. I guess it depends on how you view that type of thing, but in my opinion, if Rainsford had not killed Zaroff, then he would have undoubtedly died. Therefore, yes I believe he was justified in his decision.
Rainsford's killing of Zaroff in the final scene of “The Most Dangerous Game” is a surprising twist to the suspenseful story. c.In the story “The Most Dangerous Game,” Rainsford's decision to kill Zaroff is justified because he could not trust Zaroff to keep his word and set him free.
Which line of text from "The Most Dangerous Game" best supports the claim that Rainsford learns to fear the general? The Cossack was the cat; he was the mouse. Then it was that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terror.
The central moral theme of the story involves the distinction between murder and hunting. Rainsford sees a clear difference between the two, hence his disgust at Zaroff's hunting of men. Zaroff, on the other hand, sees his pastime as similar to a war.
E- Rainsford won therefore he murdered General Zaroff because he got to sleep in the bed. S- At the end it said that it was the best bed he ever slept in so he murdered the general.
Sanger Rainsford was found not guilty for the murders of Ivan and of General Zaroff. ... Sanger Rainsford was found not guilty for the murders of Ivan and of General Zaroff.Rainsford and Zaroff both love the thrill of the hunt, and they have travelled to different parts of the world to kill the big game they view as their greatest challenge. However, the two men differ in most other respects. ... Rainsford is still an enthusiastic hunter, while Zaroff has grown bored with the sport.
How does Zaroff's treatment of Rainsford change during the course of the story? A) At first, Zaroff is frightened of Rainsford, so he sends Ivan to meet him.
Explanation:
