1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sever21 [200]
3 years ago
5

Which desert dominates northern Africa? Gobi Kalahari Mojave Sahara

History
1 answer:
mr Goodwill [35]3 years ago
7 0

this comment has been deleted

You might be interested in
Which of these is not a problem facing the many African nations?
V125BC [204]

Answer:

tribalism is not a problem facing the many African nations

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following are non-price determinants of supply?
USPshnik [31]
1. New producers entering the market.  (More businesses producing a product or service will mean a greater supply of that product or service.)

2. Government taxes and subsidies.  (High taxes on a product may discourage suppliers, whereas government subsidies will encourage more of the product to be supplied.  A recent example was government subsidy for the production of ethanol, which caused a strong increase in ethanol production and supplies.)

4. Cost of the product or services.  (High input costs to provide the product or service will tend to decrease supply, as profit margins for producers are affected.)

5. Future expectation of prices.   This one is tricky to call a "non-price determinant," but it's not a current, actual price.  It's the anticipation that prices and sales will be strong at some future point.  So, for instance, if there is an expectation that flying cars (or personal helicopters) will someday be a high-demand item that will sell for high prices, that will spur development and supply of such an item.

<em>The only one I left out was #3, effect of mass media advertising -- because that is something that is a determinant of demand rather than supply.</em>
8 0
3 years ago
What was the military, economic and territorial implications of the treaty of Versailles on Germany?
Rufina [12.5K]

Military: Germany was limited to a very small military (no more than 100,000 men of all ranks), and was not allowed to have any heavy artillery. This was to prevent Germany from gaining a military strong enough to launch another attack, but since a strong military was a very important part of remaining a world power, this meant Germany could never hope to achieve this whilst honoring the treaty.

Economic: Germany was forced to pay reparations (as they were being blamed for the war) to many countries, mainly Belgium and France. The amount was far to much for Germany to ever pay off, and was a key factor in Germany's economic crisis shortly thereafter.

Territorial: Germany was forced to give up all of it's colonies, which were given to various League of Nations powers. This was a major loss of land and population for the country, not to mention a loss of money from said colonies, again leading back to economics.

8 0
3 years ago
In the space below, write a 500-word comparative essay evaluating the key similarities and differences between the world’s major
vodomira [7]

Form of government, political form, regime of government, political regime, system of government, political system, system of government, model of government or political model are some of the diverse ways of naming an essential concept of political science and the theory of State or constitutional right. It refers to the model of organization of constitutional power adopted by a State in terms of the relationship between the different powers. The way in which political power is structured to exercise its authority in the State, coordinating all the institutions that form it, makes each form of government requires regulatory mechanisms that are characteristic of it.

There are very different nomenclatures to denominate the different forms of government, from the theorists of Antiquity to the Contemporary Age; At present, three types of classifications are usually used:

• The elective character or not of the head of state defines a classification, between republics (elective) and monarchies (non-elective).

• The degree of freedom, pluralism and political participation defines another classification, between democratic, authoritarian and totalitarian systems, depending on whether they allow the exercise of discrepancy and political opposition to a greater or lesser degree or deny more or less radically the possibility of dissidence (establishing a single-party regime, or different types of exceptional regimes, such as dictatorships or military juntas); At the same time, the electoral system through which the popular will expresses itself in participatory systems has had very different historical configurations (direct democracy or assembly, indirect or representative democracy, census or restricted suffrage, universal male suffrage or of both sexes, different determinations of the age of majority, racial segregation, inclusion or not of immigrants, and others), as well as very different ways of altering or distorting it (borgo rotido, gerrymandering, electoral fraud, pucherazo).

• The existing relationship between the head of the State, the government and the parliament defines another classification, between presidentialisms and parliamentarisms (with many degrees or mixed forms between one and the other).

These three classifications are not exclusive, but complement each other, so that a republic can be democratic (United States or South Africa) or non-democratic (China or North Korea); a republican democracy can be parliamentary (Germany or India), semi-presidential (France or Russia) or presidential (Argentina or South Korea); and a monarchy can be democratic and parliamentary (Spain, United Kingdom or Japan), undemocratic (Saudi Arabia or Vatican City) or be placed in intermediate positions (Morocco), very usually qualified in a more or less anachronistic way with terms of the historical forms of the monarchy (feudal monarchy, authoritarian monarchy, absolute monarchy).

8 0
4 years ago
Which resulted from the British gaining control over the Dutch colony in North America?
Reika [66]
Ima preety suor it is Aa i hopea thisa helpseh
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Parallel Revolutions
    10·1 answer
  • In 1837, __________ became secretary of the first state board of education.
    5·1 answer
  • Why didn’t the Korean War turn into a nuclear war?
    7·1 answer
  • HELP FAST Which list accurately describes the order of the development of our calendar?
    14·2 answers
  • Why did Russia withdraw from the first world war?​
    6·1 answer
  • HELP!!!!!! Do you think Adams have pushed for war?
    10·1 answer
  • Supporters of Roosevelts New Deal policies would most likely have agreed with which statement?
    11·1 answer
  • Using the list of factors influencing memory,
    15·1 answer
  • The United States raised tariffs in the hopes that its people would only buy American products. Soon, other nations around the w
    9·1 answer
  • (100)
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!