1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Feliz [49]
3 years ago
8

Law is a practical discipline; theory has no place in law. With specific references to the Law of Contract, discuss.

Law
1 answer:
sladkih [1.3K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

This statement is incorrect. Theory is a fundamental component of law, because it is through legal theories that law is created.

Law is a social science, which studies the norms that govern the lives of men in society. Thus, each of the laws that the state imposes on its citizens has behind it a comprehensive study of the sociological, cultural, political, and economic conditions of the society to which they will apply.

Thus, theories such as the theory of abuse of rights or good faith apply in contracts, whereby what is established in private contracts must be fulfilled in good faith, without trying to change the interpretations for particular convenience, and without abusing the legal position to harm the other party.

Ultimately, since law is a social science, theories about its development are influential when drafting laws.

You might be interested in
What effect has globalization had on Thanksgiving?
mixas84 [53]
I believe the answer is A, ( because the word “globalization” means spreading something on an international scale ) but if not feel free to tell me so !
4 0
3 years ago
Please answer this question in at least a paragraph no links
timurjin [86]

Answer:

Well, the best answer Suitable to me is To Notify companies of My stolen identity. OR, File a report with the FTC If It's necessary For me Indicate.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Nell, a member of a protected class, applies for a job with Origami Paper Corporation, but fails the company’s employment test a
Greeley [361]

Answer:

b. disparate- impact discrimination

Explanation:

Disparate impact discrimination is a term used to refer to a situation where a member of a protected class felt harmed in a situation where he or she suffered unintentional discrimination. That is, this member suffered a type of discrimination that seemed harmless or neutral, but which harmed that member or harmed the group to which he belongs.

7 0
3 years ago
A friend of yours who has watched many Star Trek episodes and movies says, "I thought that black holes pulled everything into th
Akimi4 [234]

Star Trek was a US-based media series based on Gene Roddenberry's science-fiction TV series.

<u>Explanation: </u>

Actually, black holes draw matter to them, and it's no longer detectable when it passes inside the event horizon.   And, when events are near but still outside the event horizon, incredible things happen.  

As a matter of flaws into the black hole on an iron core, the gravitational power of the black hole is accelerated at ever-higher speeds, with gas colliding rising rates, and gas becoming warm.  

Hot gas is the heat emission and is the hot gas emission that we consider as a huge energy production. But all the gas still resides outside the black hole gravitational field.

5 0
4 years ago
Who was the first president of UK​
MArishka [77]
The two other answers to this question are spot on, but I'm going to interpret this question in a different way. I'm going to answer it as if the question said "Who was the first presidential style Prime Minister of UK?"

I would argue that there have been two 'Presidents of the United Kingdom': Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair.

For the first eight years of her administration, Margaret Thatcher was effectively 'the President of the United Kingdom'. Her administration was able to do things most post war PMs were not able to do, possibly buoyed by the large mandates she was given by the British public in 1979 and 1983.

Given the landslide election of 1997, it became almost impossible for the Conservative party to win the 2001 election, and very unlikely that would would have much of a chance in 2005 (Michael Portillo's words, not just mine). With this sort of a political landscape and public mandate, Blair was able to govern as a de-facto president, allowing him to push through parliament decisions that didn't have, not only, the public's backing but even the backing of much of the Labour party. This can be seen in Blair's decisions regarding Iraq and Afghanistan post 9/11.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the central issue in the Case of Marbury v. Madison?
    6·1 answer
  • A reversible error is: a. any mistake made in a case. b. one that might have affected the outcome of a case. c. determined durin
    15·1 answer
  • What are representatives in republican government supposed to do? ​
    8·1 answer
  • After watching "The Tell-Tale Heart" by Edgar Allen Poe, please determine whether or not the narrator was guilty of murder or no
    11·1 answer
  • I do not like our mayor at all. I think he has made some very bad choices and is not managing our town very well. I’m going to p
    6·2 answers
  • Can the police and the community ever form a partnership to fight crime? Why or why not? Does the community policing model remin
    7·1 answer
  • Tools
    12·1 answer
  • Why am I getting this in my email there is nobody in my home that needs this. Cancel all emails immediately
    5·2 answers
  • Pick a case where police used deadly force and present the facts to the class. You may want to review the Continuum of Force Pyr
    6·1 answer
  • What are executive orders examples?.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!