The reasons there are more private security than police are:
- It is expensive to fund more police.
- Need to fill in gap left by police.
- Getting into police is relatively difficult.
<h3>Why are there more private security than Police?</h3>
- As the police are funded by taxes, it would be a huge drain on the economy if more police officers were hired.
- There are many businesses and people in need of protection and because the police cannot be there all the time, private security is turned to.
- Police training and accreditation in a lot of cities in also quite cumbersome and intensive. A lot of people who apply don't make it.
In conclusion, there are several reasons for the disparity between police numbers and that of private security.
Find out more about private security at brainly.com/question/7203143.
it's so that people don't get overcharged for a small crime
^^^^ previous answer was a miscommunication
The first numerical restrictions on the number of immigrants who might enter the United States were set by the Emergency Quota Act of 1921. The National Origins Act of 1924, commonly known as the Immigration Act, strengthened and made the quotas permanent.
The Emergency Quota Act, also known as the Emergency Immigration Act of 1921, the Immigration Restriction Act of 1921, the Per Centum Law, and the Johnson Quota Act, was passed primarily in response to the large influx of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe. It was successful in limiting both those immigrants' immigration as well as the immigration of other individuals who were deemed to be "undesirables" to the United States. Although only intended to be temporary, the legislation "proved, in the long run, the most important turning-point in American immigration policy" because it added two new components to American immigration law: numerical limits on immigration and the use of a quota system to determine those limits, which became known as the National Origins Formula.
Learn more about Quota Act from
brainly.com/question/3458702
#SPJ4
California is phasing out its state-run youth prisons and shifting the responsibility to counties, 162 years after lawmakers created the first alternative to housing children as young as 12 alongside adults in San Quentin and Folsom state prisons
