The correct answer is; B; Educate women and give them equal status with men.
Further Explanation:
Many demographers and policy makers believe the best way to control population is to have women be more educated. Since many women stay home and do not further their education, they are instead having more children. Many of these women, are not aware of the opportunities that are available for them.
Young women are now being educated more and furthering their education so that they will not be stay at home mothers and have to many children that they may not be able to afford.
Learn more about population control at brainly.com/question/1216639
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
B). The Great Man and Trait Phase.
Explanation:
The 'Great Man and Trait Phase' of leadership thought that is highly concerned on nature and believed that 'great leaders are born'. This phase proposes that the leadership traits like charm, courage, wit, intellect, discernment, instincts, etc. are naturally inbuilt in the born leaders and these traits cannot be acquired or learned formally. This phase believes in the proposition that all the great leaders are the nature's gift and they inherently possess these innate skills to influence people and these natural traits cannot be aspired. Therefore, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
OMB defines earmarks as funds provided by the Congress for projects or programs where the congressional direction (in bill or report language) circumvents the merit-based or competitive allocation process, or specifies the location or recipient, or otherwise curtails the ability of the Administration to control
Explanation:
Answer:
im think im not sure but it think it A.
Explanation:
Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
