Answer:
The answer is conventional reasoning.
Explanation:
Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development are considered an adaptation concerning a psychological theory that was established by psychologist Jean Piaget. Kohlberg also began to work in aspects related to this topic in 1958 and he continued studying it throughout his life.
The conventional level of moral reasoning is usually seen in adolescents and adults. Reasoning in a conventional way implies to judge actions' morality through the comparisons between them and the aspects related to views and expectations in society. An important characteristic concerning conventional morality consists of the acceptance of society's conventions about what is wrong and what is right.
Answer:
<em>1. </em><em>Natural resources</em>
<em>2. </em><em>Transported ... Railroads</em>
<em>3. </em><em>Factories</em>
<em>4. </em><em>Produced ... Product</em>
<em>5.</em><em> Packaged </em>
<em>6. </em><em>Market</em>
<em />
Explanation:
These are the answers that fit into the spaces. This is how the cycle goes and then it repeats. Natural resources are transported by rivers or railroads and are sent to factories to be turned into products for the market which are then packed and sent to markets and then bought by consumers. The cycle continues on and on. Each different natural resource is sent to different types of markets.
If you found this to be helpful please leave a thanks, and a rating!
<em><u>If this answer is correct maybe you can mark my answer brainliest! I hope you do well on your assignment!
</u></em>
<em>~Ace <3</em><u><em>
</em></u>
Answer:
The settlers, who arrived in 1587, disappeared in 1590, leaving behind only two clues: the words "Croatoan" carved into a fort's gatepost and "Cro" etched into a tree. Theories about the disappearance have ranged from an annihilating disease to a violent rampage by local Native American tribes.
Explanation:
Miranda was convicted of kidnapping and r ape and sentenced to 20-30 years in prison on both counts. Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession, according to the Arizona Supreme Court on appeal.
A court, according to the law, is any individual or body with the authority to resolve legal disputes between parties and to administer justice in civil, criminal, and administrative matters.
Courts decide what happened and what course of action should be taken.They decide whether a person committed a crime and what punishment is appropriate. They also offer a peaceful way to settle private disputes that people are unable to resolve on their own.
To know more about the court, click here.
brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ4
