Two main risk sources need be considered when investing in a foreign country:
<span><span>
Economic risk: This risk refers to a country's ability to pay back its debts. A country with stable finances and a stronger economy should provide more reliable investments than a country with weaker finances or an unsound economy.
</span><span>
Political risk: This risk refers to the political decisions made within a country that might result in an unanticipated loss to investors. While economic risk is often referred to as a country's ability to pay back its debts, political risk is sometimes referred to as the willingness of a country to pay debts or maintain a hospitable climate for outside investment. Even if a country's economy is strong, if the political climate is unfriendly (or becomes unfriendly) to outside investors, the country may not be a good candidate for investment.</span></span><span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!</span>
Answer:
B
Explanation:
When using the indirect method to prepare the operating section of a statement of cash flows , the gain on sale of land will be deducted from the net income as it has already been included in the net income as the gain on the sales of the land , which was a non cash recognition in the course of the business.
Decrease in receivable means that there was an inflow of cash as some receivables had paid their debts , thus it is added.
The amortization is a non cash expenses that had been deducted which will need to be added back to the net income for the purpose of cash flow.
Answer:
Just use G maps and search stakehouse.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": face morale and motivation problems.
Explanation:
A high degree of formalization will result in reduced creativity as workers are told to behave in a specific way. In such organizations, strategic decision-making often happens only when there is a problem. A highly formalized structure is usually related to reduced motivation and morale issues among employees.
<span>I have not been an appointee of employee of any regulator at any point in the past two years. I have worked as an independent contractor for a computer company for the last 5 years. Since a regulator company is one that usually involves systematic schemes and benefits to the employee, my emoployer would not fall into the category.</span>
