1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Brut [27]
3 years ago
14

What was the economic relationship between the north and south in the early 1800s

History
2 answers:
lara31 [8.8K]3 years ago
5 0
1. economic systems
2. views on political power
3. thoughts of their leaders
4. role African Americans played with in America
yawa3891 [41]3 years ago
3 0
1. economic systems
2. views on political power
3. thoughts of their leaders
4. role African Americans played with in America
You might be interested in
2. Which answer best explains how suffrage was related to the election of 1824 and 1828?
timofeeve [1]
Where’s the choices ??
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were Jews blamed for having made Germany lose the war?
MAVERICK [17]

tler was convinced that Germany ought to be a supremely powerful nation and therefore could not believe that losing the war could be Germany’s fault. His view was that somebody must have betrayed Germany. Following the First World War, the victorious Allies forced Germany to pay huge amounts of money and goods in compensation.

The Treaty of Versailles also took away German lands. Hitler along with many others felt that Germany was being treated unfairly. The newly elected German government (the Weimar Government) faced enormous problems. Unhappy people wanted a leader who could make Germany strong again. Hitler firmly believed that he could be this man.


3 0
3 years ago
Which answer summarizes the main argument between the Federalists and Anti-federalists during the Constitutional Convention? (5
earnstyle [38]
The best option from the list would be that "<span>They argued about federalism and how the federal and state governments would share power," since the Federalists were in favor of a stronger central government over the states. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Andrew Jackson Writing Piece
klio [65]
After examining Jackson’s accomplishments compared to his shortcomings and controversies, it can be difficult to be unbiased when deciding if he should or should not be replaced on the bill. Many historians and scholars are in disagreement with each other on the topic. Some believe he should be featured on the back of the bill and not the front George Washington, the first president of the United States, appears on the $1 bill and was also a slaveholder like Jackson. Around 300 slaves lived at Mount Vernon when George Washington died. He also supported legislation upholding slavery and also opposed other legislation on slavery. He signed the fugitive slave act guaranteed a right for a slaveholder to recover an escaped slave. He also signed the Northwest Ordinance that recognized the Northwest territory and outlawed slavery within the territory. He never publicly denounced slavery as an institution, and there is no discussion of removing him from the $1 bill.

When taking a closer look at the behaviors of both George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, we can see that they share similarities with Jackson. If removing Andrew Jackson from the $20 bill is considered then so should removing Washington and Jefferson. However, Jackson is far too controversial, especially in recent years. He would be in the right spot if he was moved to the back of the bill, and someone like Harriet Tubman replaced him in the front. His accomplishments earn him his place on the bill, but his controversial actions lessen what he has earned which is why he should appear on the back. Especially compared to President Abraham Lincoln, who is featured on the $5 bill, Jackson should be featured on the back of the bill. Lincoln who had some of the greatest presidential accomplishments, like the passing of the 13th Amendment and the Emancipation Proclamation
8 0
2 years ago
The crusades were a terrible event in world history but were instrumental in the development of Europe. Explain this statement.
prisoha [69]

The Crusades were military expeditions organized by western European Christians to keep in check the spread of Islam and recapture former Christian territories that now were Muslim. The Crusades began in 1095 and lasted for almost 200 years.

To some historians, even when these religious wars presented gruesome results, they ultimately were a factor in European civilization development as the growth of the system of indulgences and the reinforced link between Western Christendom, feudalism, and militarism, led to the Protestant Reformation.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following Romans contributed to the spread of Christianity
    12·1 answer
  • What are the main benefits of a market economy?​
    7·1 answer
  • Briefly describe ONE major difference between Nash’s and Maier’s historical interpretations of the origins of the American Revol
    6·1 answer
  • What issue lay at the heart of the slavery debate?
    7·1 answer
  • Who Wanted to build new routes
    6·1 answer
  • Is Thor Heyerdahl theory credible or not
    7·1 answer
  • What happened to Roanoke?
    10·2 answers
  • Who were 2 people that directly or indirectly influenced the emotional component before the actual Civil War before it started t
    14·1 answer
  • How did nationalism contribute to the rise of American imperialism
    7·1 answer
  • How have political parties influenced our government?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!