Since we know that 1/4 is equal to 25%, or 0.25 in decimal form, we are able to work with 0.75 in the expression.
We are told to use j as the original price of the jeans, so we can set up the expression:
to represent the cost of the jeans with the discount.
Then to simplify, we simply take out j as a common factor, and solve what's in the parentheses:
or 
Using this equation, we can solve for the b part of the question. If the pair of jeans originally costs $60, plug in 60 to where j is in the expression:
Therefore, the cost of the jeans after the discount is C) $45.
Answer:
x = 5
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1: Distributive property
Using this property means when you have something like the equation on the right side ( 4 ( x + 3 ) ) you multiply both the values in the parentheses by the number outside:
4 ( x + 3 )
( 4 x X ) + ( 4 x 3 )
4x + 12
8x + 2 = 2x + 4x + 12
Step 2: combine like terms
Combining like terms is when you find like terms with the same variables and such and add them together:
8x + 2 = 12 + ( 2x + 4x )
8x + 2 = 12 + 6x
Step 3:Using inverse operations
This means that you need to get a variable one one side and a constant on the other:
8x + 2 ( -2 ) = 12 ( -2 ) + 6x
8x = 10 + 6x
8x ( -6x ) = 10 + 6x ( -6x )
2x = 10
Step 4: solve for the variable
The last thing you need to do is divide both sides by the constant with the variable ( 2x ) to get x by itself:
2x ( /2 ) = 10 ( /2 )
x = 5
Answer: The answer is Yes.
Step-by-step explanation: Given in the question that Radric was asked to define "parallel lines" and he said that parallel lines are lines in a plane that do not have any points in common. We are to decide whether Radric's definition is valid or not.
Parallel lines are defined as lines in a plane which never meets or any two lines in a plane which do not intersect each other at any point are called parallel.
Thus, Radric's definition is valid.
Answer:
We now want to find the best approximation to a given function. This fundamental problem in Approximation Theory can be stated in very general terms. Let V be a Normed Linear Space and W a finite-dimensional subspace of V , then for a given v ∈ V , find w∗∈ W such that kv −w∗k ≤ kv −wk, for all w ∈ W.
Step-by-step explanation:
14.59
To solve, simply plug -7.1 into -Z. Since Z is negative in the equation, it will turn the Z that’s given to us into a negative. Since that Z is already negative, it will now become a positive since that’s what two negatives being multiplied make. This is what your problem will look like:
-(-7.1) + 7.49
7.1 + 7.49 = 14.59
