Yes it's the law trust me I'm sure
The answer is <u>"distraction-conflict theory".</u>
Distraction–conflict theory proposes that attentional clash may be the key middle person of drive in investigate settings.
Distraction–conflict theory can account post hoc for the discoveries that show that evaluative or focused weight increases social help or weakness; unimportant nearness every so often creates social assistance without evaluative or aggressive weight; social loafing can happen on basic very much learned assignments; and concealed gatherings of people deliver social assistance. The attentional accentuation recommends that diversion may have an assortment of impacts on perception, state of mind change, and social conduct.
Answer:
A) "Elected Officials of the Executive Branch"
Explanation:
I believe the answer is: D.<span>The people elect representatives, who govern according to the people’s wishes.
Under popular sovereignity, the citizens do not have the power to directly vote for the type of legislation that they desired (in contrast to direct democracy).
But, the citizens could appoint the representative who had similar view and principle with them and give their trust to that representative to make the legislation that would benefit them.</span>
Under the<u> "principle of distributive justice",</u> an individual should never take any action that harms the least fortunate people in some way.
Distributive justice is an idea that tends to the responsibility for in a general public. It accept that there is a lot of decency in the conveyance of merchandise. Equal work ought to furnish people with an equivalent result as far as products obtained or the capacity to get merchandise. Distributive justice is missing when break even with work does not create parallel results or when an individual or a gathering gains an unbalanced measure of products.