Answer:
Correct answer is answer C, Magistrates could appoint Senators.
Explanation:
Magistrates <em>appointed </em>Senators. Senators were elected by <u>Consuls, Tribunes and Censors</u>. But <u>Magistrates could select Senators </u>that, as in the case of an election by Censor, did not have the right to vote. <em>Even though Senators could have been appointed by Magistrates </em>(answer C), <em>those did not have the power to elect them</em> (answer D)
Senators were a deliberative organ, while Magistrates were a legislative organ. This means that Magistrates<u> created law</u>, and Senators were a political authority in the <u>representation of the whole Roman Empire</u>, having the power to move the military into war or construct new infrastructure. Therefore, this explanation indicates that <em>Senators did not rule over</em> the Magistrates (answer A) or <em>adviced the Magistrates</em> (answer B).
The <span>Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 were and remain widely controversial since the country was founded on the freedom of speech and press. Although the Acts' supporters insisted that even in free countries these freedoms must sometimes be suspended for the good of the country as a whole. </span>
Texas Asian Americans make up a small part of the state's population and are made up of individuals of different nationalities.
<h3 /><h3>What is a multicultural society?</h3>
It occurs when there are several cultural groups living in the same place. It has intensified with globalization, with people seeking to settle in countries and cities different from their origin in search of new opportunities.
Therefore, in a multicultural society it can be difficult to draw conclusions about a specific group, such as Asian Americans, but it is possible to perceive its influence on the culture and society.
Find out more about multicultural society here:
brainly.com/question/25945210
Answer:
Explanation:
This could be an issue because it would be politicizing the Supreme Court when it is supposed to stay neutral. Judicial branch is supposed to be one of the checks and balances that keep the President from having too much power. Thus, giving the President more power over something that is supposed to restrain him or her is unethical and illogical.
