Answer:
B. Cash 1,300 Dr, Accounts Receivable 1,200 Dr, Consulting Revenue 2,500 Cr
Explanation:
Kincaid Company
Journal Entry
Date Description Debit Credit
Cash $1,300
<em>Accounts Receivable $1,200</em>
Consulting Revenue $2,500
<span>d. achievement-oriented
The Path-Goal Theory states that Dr. Weiss would respond best and benefit most from an achievement-oriented leadership style. An achievement-oriented leader sets high goals for their employees and expects them to perform at their best. The employees are not told the specific ways to meet these high goals, being expected instead to use their own abilities to figure out how. An achievement-oriented leadership style is known to work for sales and especially scientific fields, such as the one that Dr. Weiss works in.</span>
Answer:
INCREASE the consumption of Pepsi and REDUCE the consumption of Hamburger
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that Bill uses his whole budget to purchase the following :
5 cans of Pepsi
3 Hamburgers per week
And the following were the price:
Pepsi costs $1 per can
Hamburger cost $2
Bill marginal utility:
Pepsi 4
Hamburgers 6
Based on the above details this means that Bill could increase his utility by INCREASING Pepsi consumption and REDUCING hamburger consumption reason been that 5 cans of Pepsi costs $1 per can which will gives us income of $5 ($5×1) while 3 Hamburgers per week cost $2 which will give us income of $6 ($3×2) which typically means that the Hamburgers has more income that Pepsi.
Secondly since the marginal utility for Pepsi is 4 while that of Hamburgers is 6 which means that Hamburgers has higher MARGINAL UTILITY than that of Pepsi because the consumption of Hamburgers is higher than the consumption of Pepsi.
Therefore the best thing that Bill could do in order to increase his Pepsi utility is for Bill to increase Pepsi consumption and reduce hamburger consumption.
Answer:
Increase of 130 million
Explanation:
In this question, we are looking to evaluate what has happened to change in deferred tax assets. We proceed as follows;
Firstly, we calculate the current tax.
Mathematically = 40% of 400 million = 40/100 * 400 million = 160 million
Now, as we can see in the question, a decrease in deferred tax asset resulted in an increase in tax expense to a tune of $50 million
This brings the total tax expense to 160 million + 50 million = 210 million
We can see from the question that the company has only recognized a tax expense of $80 million.
This means that the change in deferred tax asset was an increase of 210 million- 80 million = $130 million
