1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lilit [14]
3 years ago
7

Need help please answer due tonight

Mathematics
2 answers:
PilotLPTM [1.2K]3 years ago
7 0
Ok The correct answer is D. 9
irakobra [83]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: I think 9

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
8+8- 19=??<br> pls help and thank u
kumpel [21]
-3 the answer is -3 ight
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Shannon graphed the system of equations. 7x – 4y= –8 y = y equals StartFraction 3 over 4 EndFraction x minus 3.x – 3 A coordinat
katovenus [111]

Answer:

its (-5 -5.9)

Step-by-step explanation:

i got id right on edg

3 0
3 years ago
What should be the paper weight
nata0808 [166]

Answer:

6.25 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

\rho=\dfrac{m}{V} \\\\V_{\text{pyramid}}= A_{\text{base}}\cdot h \cdot \dfrac{1}{3} \\\\1.6=\dfrac{400}{V} \\\\V=120 \cdot h \cdot \dfrac{1}{3} \\\\1.6=\dfrac{400}{40h} \\\\1.6=\dfrac{10}{h} \\\\1.6h=10 \\\\h=\dfrac{10}{1.6}=6.25\text{ cm}

Hope this helps!

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain how the difference of a fraction or a rational number and its additive inverse is equal to zero.
Jobisdone [24]
This question is in reverse (in two ways): 

<span>1. The definition of an additive inverse of a number is precisely that which, when added to the number, will give a sum of zero. </span>

<span>The real problem, in certain fields, is usually to show that for all numbers in that field, there exists an additive inverse. </span>

<span>Therefore, if you tell me that you have a number, and its additive inverse, and you plan to add them together, then I can tell you in advance that the sum MUST be zero. </span>

<span>2. In your question, you use the word "difference", which does not work (unless the number is zero - 0 is an integer AND a rational number, and its additive inverse is -0 which is the same as 0 - the difference would be 0 - -0 = 0). </span>

<span>For example, given the number 3, and its additive inverse -3, if you add them, you get zero: </span>
<span>3 + (-3) = 0 </span>

<span>However, their "difference" will be 6 (or -6, depending which way you do the difference): </span>

<span>3 - (-3) = 6 </span>
<span>-3 - 3 = -6 </span>

<span>(because -3 is a number in the integers, then it has an additive inverse, also in the integers, of +3). </span>

<span>--- </span>

<span>A rational number is simply a number that can be expressed as the "ratio" of two integers. For example, the number 4/7 is the ratio of "four to seven". </span>

<span>It can be written as an endless decimal expansion </span>
<span>0.571428571428571428....(forever), but that does not change its nature, because it CAN be written as a ratio, it is "rational". </span>

<span>Integers are rational numbers as well (because you can always write 3/1, the ratio of 3 to 1, to express the integer we call "3") </span>

<span>The additive inverse of a rational number, written as a ratio, is found by simply flipping the sign of the numerator (top) </span>

<span>The additive inverse of 4/7 is -4/7 </span>

<span>and if you ADD those two numbers together, you get zero (as per the definition of "additive inverse") </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>If you need to "prove" it, you begin by the existence of additive inverses in the integers. </span>
<span>ALL integers each have an additive inverse. </span>
<span>For example, the additive inverse of 4 is -4 </span>

<span>Next, show that this (in the integers) can be applied to the rationals in this manner: </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = ? </span>
<span>common denominator, therefore you can factor out the denominator: </span>

<span>(4 + -4)/7 = ? </span>
<span>Inside the bracket is the sum of an integer with its additive inverse, therefore the sum is zero </span>
<span>(0)/7 = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>Since this is true for ALL integers, then it must also be true for ALL rational numbers.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Answer help me me me me
Kobotan [32]

Answer:

409

Step-by-step explanation:

296 = 200 + 90 + 6
The value of the 9 is 90 in 296.
1/10 of 90 is 9. The only number that has a 9 in the units digit is 409.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do you solve this math problem-2(x+3y)=18
    12·1 answer
  • How many leaves on a tree diagram are needed to represent all possible combinations tossing a coin and rolling a dice
    7·2 answers
  • The ratio of walkers to riders was 5 to 3. If 315 were walkers, how many riders were there?
    5·1 answer
  • Problem Carroll bikes 111 kilometer east, 444 kilometers north, and then 555 kilometers east again. How far is Carroll from her
    13·2 answers
  • Oliver works at a bookstore. He packed 20 identical paperbacks and 9 identical textbooks in a box. The total mass of the books w
    13·1 answer
  • Which of these best describes the Pythagorean theorem?
    15·1 answer
  • which statement could be used to explain why tge function h(x)=x^3 has an inverse relation that is also function
    12·1 answer
  • The first new path will increase access to the fountain. it will be perpendicular to the existing path and pass through F(4,14).
    15·2 answers
  • 61. Often it is necessary to rearrange an equation so that one variable is expressed in terms of others. For example, the equati
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE HURRY Which of the following is NOT a solution in the solution region.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!