Answer:
I'm not able to do it but I can tell you how
Step-by-step explanation:
make the 10a-9 equal 14a-25 solve for that a then use the answer to a to then plug in thst number in all of them and that would be your answer
Answer:
-1x + -1
Step-by-step explanation:
(-6x+3)+(5x-4)
(-6x+3)+(5x-4)
-1x + -1
Answer: The z-scores for a woman 6 feet tall is 2.96 and the z-scores for a a man 5'10" tall is 0.25.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x and y area the random variable that represents the heights of women and men.
Given : The heights of women aged 20 to 29 are approximately Normal with mean 64 inches and standard deviation 2.7 inches.
i.e.

Since , 
Then, z-score corresponds to a woman 6 feet tall (i.e. x=72 inches).
[∵ 1 foot = 12 inches , 6 feet = 6(12)=72 inches]

Men the same age have mean height 69.3 inches with standard deviation 2.8 inches.
i.e.

Then, z-score corresponds to a man 5'10" tall (i.e. y =70 inches).
[∵ 1 foot = 12 inches , 5 feet 10 inches= 5(12)+10=70 inches]

∴ The z-scores for a woman 6 feet tall is 2.96 and the z-scores for a a man 5'10" tall is 0.25.
There are more compact cars (4*10 = 40) compared to trucks (2*10 = 20); however, the pictogram might make it appear that there are more trucks because the individual truck icon is larger compared to an individual compact car icon.
To anyone giving this image a quick glance, they may erroneously conclude that there are more trucks since their eye would notice the trucks first. Also, the person might think there are more trucks because bigger sizes tend to correspond to more proportion.
In real life, a truck is larger than a compact car, but the icons need to be the same size to have the figure not be misleading.
A very similar issue happens with the mid-size cars vs the compact cars as well. The three mid-size car icons span the same total width as the compact cars do, indicating that a reader might mistakenly conclude that there are the same number of mid-size cars compared to compact ones (when that's not true either).
The sound wave with a <u>frequency of 20</u> waves/sec is 800 longer than the wavelength of a sound wave with a <u>frequency of 16,000</u> waves/sec
<h3>Calculating wavelength </h3>
From the question, we are to determine how many times longer is the first sound wave compared to the second sound water
Using the formula,
v = fλ
∴ λ = v/f
Where v is the velocity
f is the frequency
and λ is the wavelength
For the first wave
f = 20 waves/sec
Then,
λ₁ = v/20
For the second wave
f = 16,000 waves/sec
λ₂ = v/16000
Then,
The factor by which the first sound wave is longer than the second sound wave is
λ₁/ λ₂ = (v/20) ÷( v/16000)
= (v/20) × 16000/v)
= 16000/20
= 800
Hence, the sound wave with a <u>frequency of 20</u> waves/sec is 800 longer than the wavelength of a sound wave with a <u>frequency of 16,000</u> waves/sec
Learn more on Calculating wavelength here: brainly.com/question/16396485
#SPJ1