1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pepsi [2]
3 years ago
9

In the 1870s, who claimed to have saved the white south from the corruption and misgovernment of northern and black officials?

History
2 answers:
Kobotan [32]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Redeemers

Explanation:

The Redeemers were a political coalition that became popular in the South during the Reconstruction Era. The Redeemers wanted white people to regain absolute control of politics in the South and supported white supremacy. They also believed that they had saved the South from the corruption and misgovernment of northern and black officials. This group included rich planters, businessmen and professionals.

dexar [7]3 years ago
5 0
<span>Redeemers
</span>
<span>Redeemers were the southern wing of the Bourbon Democrats, the conservative, pro-business faction in the Democratic Party, who pursued a policy of Redemption, seeking to oust the Radical Republicans from the southern states.</span>

You might be interested in
According to the Constitution, how does the US directly determine the number of electoral votes received by each state?
Salsk061 [2.6K]
It is A because each state receives electoral votes by the amount of members from that state in the House of Representatives
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the family of Chiang Kai-Shek make a living?
Jobisdone [24]

Answer: Chiang Kai-shek (31 October 1887 – 5 April 1975),also known as Chiang or Chieh-shih , was a Chinese Nationalist politician, revolutionary and military leader who served as the leader of the Republic of China between 1928 and 1975, first in mainland China until 1949 and then in Taiwan until his death.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Could you have legitimacy but not authority?
kotegsom [21]

Answer: yes

Explanation:

Power is an entity's or individual's ability to control or direct others, while authority is influence that is predicated on perceived legitimacy. Consequently, power is necessary for authority, but it is possible to have power without authority. In other words, power is necessary but not sufficient for authority.

4 0
3 years ago
What caused Christianity to spread to Britain, Ireland, and northern Europe?
devlian [24]

I would say its probably d

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should members of the black community carry guns to protect against police brutality today?​
vovikov84 [41]

Answer:

This sounds a lot like the black panthers. You should research them.

Explanation:

Personally I think that anyone who feels threatened should be able to defend themselves.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Can someone summarize this please?
    8·1 answer
  • How was Germany divided up at the end of ww2 how did this effect Berlin?
    7·2 answers
  • In the era from 1870 to 1890, the label "the Gilded Age" originally derived from Group of answer choices the money system, which
    10·1 answer
  • Complete online class for price
    13·1 answer
  • What was the name of the group who believed in violent protests in the USA during the 1960s
    8·1 answer
  • Peter the Great wanted to (1 point)
    7·1 answer
  • -Senator Calhoun<br> Is Senator Calhoun expressing a proslavery or<br> antislavery bias?
    9·1 answer
  • How were the Korean War and the Vietnam war similar in terms of their impact on the Cold War
    12·1 answer
  • What lesson can we learn from the Panic of 1837?
    13·1 answer
  • I need help almost due and im trying to finish up
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!