Answer:
Vietnam - consists of primarily low=wage and low-skilled jobs
Singapore - has become a leading financial center
Malaysia - the world's leading producers of semiconductors
Explanation:
Southeast Asia is a very interesting region from every perspective, including the economy. Some nations are still oriented mostly toward agriculture, some depend on oil sales, some are financial centers. All in all, all of the nations in the region have seen significant development in the past couple of decades. Vietnam is still a country where the wages are low, and the majority of the labor force is low skilled, but the country still manages to have quick economic growth, mostly because of the foreign investments. Malaysia's economy is mostly consisted of two totally opposite economic sectors, one is the agriculture, and the other is the high-tech industry, both of which bring in a lot of income for the country. Singapore is a city-state. But despite its size, it has become an economic giant. The country is located in an excellent position, and its economy is mostly based around high-tech equipment, innovations, banking.
I think that <span>extrapolating the behaviors of ancient hunter-gatherers by studying modern hunter-gatherer groups is a valid approach.
Modern hunter-gatherer groups learn how to do their daily tasks from the lessons and teachings imparted to them by their elders. Their elders also learned from their elders and so on. This is how knowledge and skills are passed down from one generation to another. One way or another, the methods and applications that modern hunter-gatherer groups use originated from the behaviors of ancient hunter-gatherers. There may be changes but these changes are usually applied in order for the group to adapt to the conditions that they are living in at that time.
In short, </span><span>learning about modern hunter-gatherer groups is vital in understanding early societies because the practices of today are the results of the practices of yesterday with variation to ensure longevity.</span>
In order to be elected governor, any gubernatorial candidate is required to obtain a statewide plurality of votes cast in their election. Given the dominance of the two-party system in Oklahoma (between the Democrats and the Republicans), the plurality is often a majority as well. However, in case the event that two or more candidates have an equal number of votes, the state legislature, by joint ballot, elects one of those candidates governor.
The constitution names the governor the state's chief magistrate and vested in him the supreme executive power. As a consequence, the governor is the preeminent figure in Oklahoma politics. Though he or she shares power with many other executive officers, in the event of a vacancy anywhere in the executive branch, he or she appoints their successor. The governor appoints the heads of state departments and agencies as well as the members of most state commissioners and boards. However, these appointments do require Senate approval. Some serve at his or her pleasure while others serve fixed terms.
Answer:
sorry buddie but you know free points. you gotta love it. :)
Explanation:
2023 because by the way the economic state of the world is going ukraine will be defenseless and be overwhelmed by russia
